Fan pours drink on Wilder

Kill?

I said he deserved his have his skull pounded in.

No different to what CT80 said about him getting beaten senseless.

But you don't want to call him out? Why's that then?

I think your obsession with ''man juice'' and old men says a lot about you.

 

Don’t try to flip your obsession and fear of liquids onto me, not going to work.

You bring up CST to help you? Why don’t you PM him and ask him to defend you? Lmao

Hey little tip Stephy, if you really feel like you are being stalked unjustly on a boxing forum, it’s a good idea to stop replying to the one that you claim is stalking you, lol

If you can’t handle me put me on ignore, or just stop replying. If you want to reply don’t complain about being stalked you insecure forum baby you.

 

Brits show class once again lol

 

Handle you? Your child's play.

The reason I'm responding to you Mr Stalker, is because I like to expose your paper thin see through agenda.

And why decided to bring up CT80 isn't to look for an ally, it is simply demonstrate and show all, that you're not upset with my words, rather the problem lies with the fact that you're upset with me for whatever I may or may not have done to you in the past.

Which is why you have been desperately vying for my attention every time I post.

So my advice for you, is to get over whatever you feel i may have done to you.

 

You have done nothing to me.

You make stupid posts I point it out.

Obviously if you caved a old mans face in for throwing a beer at you you would go to jail end of. You know that, I know that and everybody on this forum knows that. That’s if you were lucky enough not to have your own face smashed in for daring to smash another’s face in for throwing a beer at you, you cowardly forum freak.

But let’s be honest, if that beer hit you you would enjoy it secretly praying that old guy put even a lil man juice in it.

 

You're a chump that would walk away if someone throws **** on you and you expect others to live by your cowardly code of conduct.

You would not be charged for acting in self defence.

The same way if an intruder attempts to break in to my property and they end up with a crowbar driven through the back of their skull, I will not be charged with murder because I'd be acting in self defense even though the intruder hasn't caused injury, the intention alone to break in, was enough to justify retaliation.

 

A intruder breaking into your house is the same as a old dude throwing a beer on you in public? How stupid are you?? That’s just not true knucklehead.

You see this is what I mean when I say I have no problem with you, you make stupid posts and I point it out it’s a simple as that, you realize deep down that I’m correct but you can’t handle that feeling and then you over react only to lie to yourself by pretending you are being stalked on a boxing forum, lol,

 

You got that right. Reason being I have no idea of intentions of the intruder just as I have no idea of the intentions behind someone aiming to throw fluid over my head.

You assume that it's simply beer when in reality you wouldn't know

As I've said before you have no way of knowing what they've put inside a bottle before it's thrown, be it ****, acid or beer.

That's why it is just if the perpetrator gets their face completely punched in, including your granddad who you seem to be hellbent on defending here

 

Clearly the old saying with age comes wisdom doesn't apply to that fool, stupid and dangerous thing to do.

 

Ok, good rebuttal, now first of all If acid is throw on Donkey that old man is done by everyone there as well as what is left of him is thrown in jail so you and I are not arguing about ACID so don’t bring in OFF TOPIC points in a attempt to bolster your point. That’s cowardly and sneaky so don’t do it again.

So we are talking about a beer that could have what inside of it?? What is it inside the beer that freaks you out so much you would punch a mans face in for throwing it on you? Slapping him into submission I understand and I would do the same under a lot of conditions, but caving his face in is too much dude. You could kill a old guy by punching them too hard and too many times in the face. Seriously, that’s why you would get arrested. He would be charged with a low grade liquid assault (the charge exists in most countries believe it or not) and YOU would be charged with a far more serious degree of assault you confused forum fool.

So again, what’s in the beer? You can’t just assume that because it could of had feces/etc in it you are therefore permitted by law to smash a dudes face in????? Unless your idea of smashing a dudes face in is giving him one good solid shot in the chops and leaving it at that?? (If so you should of said that)

Now if you could prove that there was feces or man juice in the beer, as let’s say after the beer splashed away you had huge clumbs of man juice running down your face, then Yes you would be given more of a pass,,,,,,,,

But that’s not we are debating now is it.

If you cave the old mans face in and tell a judge that you did it because there COULD of been feces or man juice etc in it, well the judge is going to laugh at you and charge you as well as force you to get therepy for fear of man juice/feces while you are incarcerated.

Which would be important because in prison you would no doubt have to really start dealing with feces and man juice.

 

Now you're finally making a worthwhile post.

The reason why I would be alarmed if liquid was thrown over me would be due to the fact tha it is not unusual for people to throw bottles containing ****, feces or corrosive substances. And especially in this time when acid attacks have risen in the uk. So my reaction would be, that someone is trying to cause harm and so in that belief I would be in the position to defend myself against the perpetrator who I would consider is a threat to my life/well being. Rightly or wrongly, a human being's natural reaction would be to eliminate the immediate threat.

t's not dissimilar to a mad man shouting ''Bomb'' in a crowded area to get his kicks off as a prank, however those who are at the end of his prank, have no way of knowing he is bluffing and so they rightly react as if he is a bomber. This would inevitably lead to member/s of the public jumping on the suspected bomber and beating them to a pulp in order to eliminate the perceived threat.

In a court of law you could argue you were acting in good faith in response to an immediate threat which you had good reason to perceive.

Those mitigating circumstances surrounding the reaction would have to be taken into consideration in my defence. The absolute worse case scenario is that you could be charged with is GBH which doesn't carry a custodial sentence, normally in the soft touch uk it's suspended sentence or community service. And the judge and jury would only have to take one look at the bitter, twisted and contorted old scoundrel with a rap sheet of convictions and one look at me with only a great shiny bright smile next to my name, to know and understand that I'm the good guy.

 

Everything you said made fair sense and the effort was excellent.

Just one problem, you know the part where you said the judge was looking at you and him? Well if his face is caved in your shiny bright smile may work against you no matter how bitter, twisted and contorted he looked before you caved his face in.

 

I thought Wilder was getting huge amounts of love from the British fans?

 

Not everyone in London is English.....in Edinburgh is Scottish.....in Cardiff is Welsh.

Stop trying to be clever.


The point remains, nobody knew who Wilder was before he started shouting at the conference.

 

Not once did I say it was alright nor did I apologise for him. Tut tut.

Two replies in and you're already attempting to twist my words and losing your way. Feeble!

I assume you struggle with simple tasks too.

Anyway, I thought you were mentally challenged. Thanks for confirming.