Primo Carnera's ability

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by catchwtboxing, Aug 25, 2018.


  1. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,510
    36,730
    Jul 4, 2014
    Good day all.

    I see there is a lot of controversy on these boards over Primo Carnera's actual ability level, just as there was in his day. I am going to give you what I have read about it, mostly form old copies of KO and RING magazine back in the day. I accept any corrections, additions, arguments, etc. But let's keep this one civil. People have been debating this for 80 years now, so yes, there are differing opinions. Let us break it down into his boxing ability, power, and punch resistance.


    BOXING ABILITY
    It is true that when he was first brought in as as a sort of attraction, he had no ability whatsoever, and it is generally accepted that a lot of his initial fights were outright fixed by the mob, either through pay-offs or intimidation. I remember even reading that when one fighter (it MIGHT have been Godfrey--been a long time) refused to roll over, they got to one of his handlers and had pepper juice rubbed in his eyes. At this phase, he truly was a "circus act" or "circus strong man," as some posters have said. HOWEVER...

    Carnera himself realized that he was being used, and as a good athlete (he was an excellent wrestler, later taken into the fake pros because he could legitimately shoot and beat most of the guys on the roster) and a man of pride, he worked very hard to develop some legit boxing skill, employing a style that used his great size to keep his opponents at bay with his reach and wear them down with his weight. No, Ali it wasn't, but guys like Loughran and Uzcuden were legitimately beaten.

    POWER
    As noted by many, he was not and never developed into a true one-punch knockout artist who used hand speed, technique and timing to end things. But as a huge powerhouse of a man, if he got you trapped in the corner, he could inefficiently club you to death with sheer strength. And that is really all there is to it. In boxing, a heavy hand does not always go with a heavy frame, and we all know that, but a guy who was 6'6" and about as wide across the shoulders is going to do something when he hits you.

    PUNCH RESISTANCE
    A lot of people call him china-chinned, and yes, it is generally accepted that even light-hitters like Loughran could wobble him if they could get through to his chin. HOWEVER, this was partially compensated by the fact that his rock-hard, muscular body could take punches all night long. So no, his overall punch-resistance was not dreadful. He just had to protect the chin as best he could.

    In the end, a lot of the man's best wins, like Loughran, Unzcuden, and Sharkey, appeared to be legit. Sharkey claimed until the day he died that Carnera just knocked him out. He would have nothing to gain by lying. Contrast that to Jack Johnson who claimed until the day he died that he took a dive to Willard, even though he lay there on the canvas for like 20 minutes afterwards.

    So there you have it. A complex issue. Perhaps one of the most unorthodox heavyweights ever, but in the end, yes, a good one nonetheless, deserving respect.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2018
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Joe Louis: “He has nothing.”

    Benny Leonard: “He has marvelous defense.”

    /thread
     
    SHADAPBLAD likes this.
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    This was extensively covered recently, so I'm not including myself here.
     
  4. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,510
    36,730
    Jul 4, 2014
    Hmmm. Dropping in to tell me that you are not commenting.

    OK
     
    willcross and SHADAPBLAD like this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    It's a courtesy telling you that this was covered thoroughly very recently.Maybe trawl past posts first?
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,509
    46,064
    Feb 11, 2005
    Pantomiming the movements of a boxer against an opponent who has no motivation to actually defeat you is not boxing.
     
    GlaukosTheHammer likes this.
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    This is the best I’ve ever heard it described

    Thanks seamus

    “Carnera is from that school of thought where the next heavyweight champ was "discovered" in some remote backwoods whose gifts were so prodigious compared to the rest of humanity they only needed a few sessions with a trainer to be polished up and presented to the public, a title shot looming from day one.

    Putting these guys in with modern elite pros would be a travesty... unless you still subscribe to the above school of thought.”
     
    JoffJoff and mcvey like this.
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Goes 6 rounds with Louis.
    11 with Baer on a fractured ankle.
    Wins lineal HW Belt.
    Defends it twice.

    Would be a travesty if matched up with Dillon Whyte...

    Logic adds up. /s
     
    choklab and BitPlayerVesti like this.
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Can you name another boxer who pantomimes the movements of a boxer, as opposed to being an actual boxer?

    Are you saying that Benny Leonard was duped? lol
    Benny Leonard?!

    These critiques are sounding more and more ridiculous the further we move away from the 20th century tall tale boxing literature.
     
  10. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    "Say, how did you manage to survive 6 rounds with the Brown Bomber?!"

    "Easy, I just pretended to box, and it worked!"

    - What some people seriously think
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,572
    27,216
    Feb 15, 2006
    As others have said, we have debated this in monotonous detail previously, but I will summarise my thoughts:

    Boxing ability
    Carnera was actually pretty good from a technical standpoint. He was schooled by Abe Attell to develop him as far as was realistically possible.

    Power
    His power was not particularly impressive for a fighter of his size, but he was at least a punishing hitter, especially to the cruiser weight sized contenders of the day.

    Punch resistance
    Again not great for a man of his size, but his heart and willingness to climb off the canvas, made him difficult to put away.

    Allegations of fixed fights
    Some of his early fights seem to have been fixed, but I personally believe that his legacy fights were all on the level.
     
  12. KernowWarrior

    KernowWarrior Bob Fitzsimmons much bigger brother. Full Member

    3,151
    3,480
    Jul 12, 2012
    Was he on the canvas for 20 minutes?
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Carnera had terrible mechanics, poor defensive reflexes, and questionable boxing IQ but other than that I guess he was pretty good from a technical standpoint.

    If we combed through all of his existing footage, we could probably piece together a few minutes of him moving and punching like a technically proficient boxer.
     
    SuzieQ49 and reznick like this.
  14. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Ok, were making some progress.
     
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Sorry, that was mostly sarcasm.
     
    Man_Machine and SuzieQ49 like this.