Was George Foreman an oaf?

Bang on. And comeback George's balance was second to none.

 

No he wasn't an Oaf but he was an helluva slugger. Even in his return to boxing 10 yrs after he initially quit.

 

Do you consider Foreman to have been a better technician than Carnera in his first incarnation?

 

What has Carnera to do with Reznik's thread?

 

It was not me who brought him into it!

 

Foreman looked clumsier than he was. There was little spring in his step and he had a habit of moving his guard about like he was removing cobwebs, but in terms of a thudding jab, cutting off the ring then lighting you up...very good.

 

He beat a good defensive,durable fighter in Peralta twice whilst still a comparative novice.Carnera ever do that?

 

Carnera was actually closer to clumsy. A big guy who managed to get his boxing together enough to make it work.

 

Rez gawn again already?

 

A OAF my ass .A HOF yes !

 

OAFeverated George 1 , was the only 'ATG' I can think of who got so totally exposed ( more than once) ( 3 times if you count Lyle) in his prime.

 

One chop just wasn't quite enough was it

Exposed in a fight he won LOL

*OAFerrated

 

Exposed is exposed... You can't put the cork back in the bottle .

 

Yes much more

 

An oaf, no. A fool, sometimes. Lacking confidence? Yes post Ali to his first retirement.