Wtf is the minimum age to become a Thai prizefighter???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Aug 26, 2018.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    Fact & fiction? :nusenuse:

    Also the fact that karate (even full-contact) is for pussies. :sisi1 Boxing is, OTOH, legit dangerous. I don't offhand know the statistics but I'm guessing the number of cases of Parkinson's or fatalities related to sanctioned karate matches are minuscule compared with boxing. If there are even any.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    Is it? Or did you just drag in a completely unrelated point thinking you've negated mine with a lazy wave of your hand and some vague whataboutism?

    I'd say "nice try", but it wasn't.
     
  3. anthoto1

    anthoto1 Active Member Full Member

    713
    573
    Apr 13, 2013
    Whatever the minimum age is, it's still much higher than the one required to become a Thai prostitute.
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006

    Bingo. Under adult supervision until they have themselves reached the age of majority & self-determination.

    If you leave the door open to kids as young as 14 competing in an unlimited age pool and with loosened regulation where the axiom "protect yourself at all times" and "anything goes (so long as you don't violate the MoQ rules, which were in their day drafted more to serve the interest of a very English stiff-upper-lip sense of "sportsmanship" than fighter safety per se), then something very wrong has occurred... an important boundary line blurred. That slope is extremely slippery. Just because one time it happened to pan out "fine" doesn't mean the next 14 year old won't be literally murdered in the ring by a primed-out monster twice over their senior at 28 years old.

    So fundamentally that is what is wrong here. The door being left open for kids being made (or even allowed) to fight adults. Then, speaking to your other point here:

    Yes, that exploitation of children factor is one more additional layer of scum-bag creepiness ON TOP OF the already fundamentally wrong thing. So this is a complex issue that is problematic for more than one reason - and while not all of those reasons are equal, that doesn't mean any of them are less than severely alarming.
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    Something that is true and horrible and not germane to anything being discussed here whatsoever.
     
  6. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,841
    3,989
    Apr 26, 2014
    The law clearly states that the minimum age is 18. So stop talking rubbish.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    Nobody does that, punk, stop making shit up. I've literally never once banned anyone for that - and like @CST80 mentioned, I'm the only mod that insists on having my cusses visible to full integrity in my posts without spelling alterations or asterisks.

    If he could, The Professor would probably ban me every week...and I would keep bypassing the filter, every week. I wouldn't even be mad at him, really, as he's just a force of nature, doing his thing...like you wouldn't get irrationally upset with a shark for taking a bite of your leg if you left it dangling over the boat; just doing its thing. And it would be in my nature to never learn my lesson, and keep bypassing it, and getting banned.

    So there's literally no double standard. There is no such thing as one particular mod who tells people not to bypass the swear filter and bans them for it, but also does it himself.

    There are the mods that enforce that rule, and there is the one renegade doing his own thing and wantonly getting away with it for as long as he can - but also not banning anybody or telling anyone they shouldn't do it, so not a hypocrite.

    This speaks to a broader issue - stop lumping the mods together like we are some large Borg collective unit. We are individuals, each doing his own thing. Cheers.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    "You can't talk about my problems because you have problems too" isn't a valid argument. That is a deflection, and the laziest & most cowardly way to escape an uncomfortable discourse.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    :risas3:, btw @ all these jealous bitches whining about my getting away with using bad words.

    "That's unequal treatment!" - yep, because, well, you and I aren't equal. I get a pass because I've earned a pass. I've been here since 2006 and in any single calendar year since have contributed more of value here than all of you whiners ever will, combined. So, kindly eat my ass like good little bluestreak wrasses, until it looks professionally bleached. Thanks. :thumbsup:
     
    pipe wrenched and bandeedo like this.
  10. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,841
    3,989
    Apr 26, 2014
    You seem only interested in offending people. You focus on the negative aspects of a whole nation because a kid participated in a boxing match? My point is no country is perfect.

    If anyone challenges your opinion you immediately try to shoot them down or pick apart what they said. You come across as a bully.
     
    skunk, OvidsExile and sjp17 like this.
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    I'm not focusing on the negative aspects of a whole nation. Do you see me discussing anything other than my originally intended thread subject, namely children too young being pushed into professional combat sports? No, you don't. I'm not here to just shit on Thailand indiscriminately. But I will continue to shit on this one cultural practice, because I feel that fourteen is too young and that cultural differences ought not excuse something that is fundamentally, universally wrong.
     
  12. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,841
    3,989
    Apr 26, 2014
    Nobody is forcing the kids into the ring.
     
    sjp17 likes this.
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,762
    80,776
    Nov 30, 2006
    They shouldn't be permitted to make that choice (in the context of professional boxing, not just kids sparring each other with strict observant supervision & without paying audiences) until their bodies & brains are done growing.
     
    CST80 likes this.
  14. anthoto1

    anthoto1 Active Member Full Member

    713
    573
    Apr 13, 2013
    Well, I think these two facts are a good example of children's rights in Thailand.
     
  15. sjp17

    sjp17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,971
    1,252
    Apr 22, 2011
    Like i said before get your ass over to Thailand and spearhead your campaign in the boxing gyms and Muay Thai circuit, start banging the drum since you think its so ****ing wrong and awful.