If you want to claim he's faded, okay. He's not washed up. Was he washed up when he fought Jacobs too? GG is a great fighter. But he's always been hit flush. Kelly had a 75" reach, and they'd have had a tear up at some stage of the fight. You're living in a fantasy if you think that Kelly wouldn't have hit him flush at some point.
If Kelly had taken better care of himself, this is a fight we could've seen. Believe it or not, they're only 4 days apart age wise.
ridiculous, a unified champion at the height of his success is not washedup. A draw with an elite towered above anything else in his career.
I know what it means, Golovkin is still potent despite not being the destroyer he was in his late 20’s early 30’s.
what you wrote was complete nonsense. the sooner you take it back, the better it will look 4u. dont crap on 3G's best career bout ever.
It's you that's weird. Faded and washed up are 2 very different things. I think that Jacobs and Canelo would have given him tough fights at any point of his career. He may only be slightly faded. Washed up = shot. A fighter who is washed up is no longer able to achieve success at the highest level. GG isn't washed up. He's just had a spectacular knockout and many people believe that he beat Canelo.