Media Scorecards: Canelo-GGG 2

1. Golovkin
2. Canelo
3. Canelo
4. Golovkin
5. Golovkin
6. Golovkin
7. Canelo
8. Golovkin
9. Golovkin
10. Golovkin
11. Golovkin
12. Canelo

8-4/116-112 Golovkin

 

You mean the stats that GGG landed more overall?

 

I'm really not a fan of either of these guys and it was pretty clear to me that golovkin edged it by a couple of rounds

The WORST result I could possibly give golovkin would be a draw. Anything past that and you are giving Canelo clear golovkin rounds

 

I had that card except gave Canelo round 1 as well

115-113 golovkin

 

This content is protected

 

Wow, not even one person scored it for Alvarez.

I thought Gennady won 7-5. There was many close rounds, especially early on, so the level of subjectivity goes up greatly in those razor close type of rounds. GGG could've made the fight easier for himself had he stepped on the gas a bit more earlier on and not allowed Canelo to dictate the fight. Alvarez was way too comfortable for most of the fight and was allowed to stay in and around the center of the ring. Poor ring generalship execution from Golovkin's part but I still believe he did enough to win.

 

Yes. The stats where GGG landed more, but Canelo landed more power punches in 9 rounds--which happened to be cleaner than GGG's shots too.

 

No. Not one person scored it for Canelo when the Canelo scorecards are intentionally left off.

 

Will you post the media scores in favour of Canelo then please.

 

When I count to 3 you will awaken, fully alert. One, two...

 

Anthony Fowler
Clarissa Shields
Michelle Rosado
Graham Houston
Gerry Cooney
Conor Ruebusch
Austin Trout...

I think the most common score this time is a draw. The most common last time was 115-114 GGG. There were no robberies.

 

He was hit with the more damging punches in a few rounds and was hurt in 1 or 2 but thats it. GGG was also hurt to the body.

Cleamer punches canelo.
Harder punches canelo(in majority of the rounds because GGG was throwing alot more cautious pawing shots than hard ones)

Ring generalship clearly canelo

Defense canelo

Agressor canelo


There is no debate about who won, not woth the current scoring criteria


If you dont think the scoring criteria are fair thats fine but thats a different debate.

 

Meaningless. 75% of the punches GGG threw were pawing and probing, he was afraid of getting countered and barely threw hard punches, even less than the first fight.
Every punch canelo threw was hard, snappy and eye catching while GGG was pawing and probing because he lacked confidence for the type of shots he threw vs brook for example.


Its his age, canelos speed intimidated him because he cant keep up with his punches with 36 year old reflexes. A 32 year old GGG probably would have fought a much better fight but the 36 year old one lost this one. Plain and simple.

 

Thank you. Point proven.

 

The issue with giving this fight to Canelo for me is that his performance dropped off after about the 7th round or so. GGG started tagging him in the later rounds. Nobody would have complained about a draw this time.

GGG found another effective weapon than his jab, with the uppercut too late.