Golovkin is 40-0 and YOU better remember it.

38-1-1

 

Agree 100%

 

I'm was pulling for G and thought he won definitely won the 1st fight, but in no way, shape or from was that a robbery on Saturday night. Razor thin decision that could have gone either way. I thought G eeked out the win too, but it was by no means a robbery.

 

If you thought he won, but he lost officially, then it was a robbery.

 

Not at all. As a guy pulling for G, and as someone that doesn't like Canelo, I naturally gave him a couple rounds that could of gone either way. But there is simply no way I can call it a robbery. Zero problem with the decision. If I was pulling for Canelo, I obviously would have given him the 50/50 rounds. It's the natural bias we use as fans pulling for one guy or the other. It's very hard for a self admitted fan of a certain fighter to be objective. That is why I can't call a close fight a robbery. But, to each his own.

 

You did?

 

That's what Can'tnelo's Army was saying all fight week...

 

This fight really ****ed you up, didn't it?

 

I think like Drugnelo's dirty tests, you'd just rather not talk about it.

 

Floyd Sr. thinks Canelo won.

This content is protected

 

Audley is 38 seconds nil, nice one

TRUE. but that could easily have gone the other way.

Say if Audlee had thrown a punch.

 

I think arum set Pacquiao's up both times against horn and Bradley so he could milk those guys for pointless in-house rematches and trilogies. Pac turned it around on him and refused to fight Horn again

 

Is a robbery because i said so wahh wahhh!! You are super pathetic hahahaha

 

Don’t believe a thing that this crack head is saying. He only want us to look at his is son’s against Canelo as greater now. Canelo’s lost twice, plain and simple. Only dishonest people, GGG haters or Canelo’s nuthuggers will say that Canelo won.

 

SO this "hardcore Mexican boxing fan" is just finding out that boxing is all about the money. Sounds like moron to me.