I'll tell you one thing, Froch at 168 would have marked GGG

Congratulations, you are a moron.

 

If your argument is that he beat guys in the ams that would fight as a super middle in the pro's , then it is you that is the official Moron.

 

If Sergo Mora can floor Jacobs , GGG puts him into a pine box

 

Groves beats Golovkin too lol.

Canelo is a small middleweight who GGG obviously felt was too strong to walk through......
Jacobs wouldn't be able compete with Froch, yet took 5 rounds off GGG.....


Froch is too big and has a very underrated jab.

 

The Groves Froch fought would blow Jacobs into oblivion.

 

Wasn´t even thinking about that.

What i am laughing at is that you automatically assume Golovkin would loose because he from a lower weight class.
No talk about technique or anything like that.
I hate to play the triangle theory but how come was Golovkin able to beat Murray so lopsidedly, yet Murray gave hell to Groves?
By your logic, Groves´s size "advantage" should have guaranteed him a one sided W.

 

Kessler has achievements at 168. Golovkin had none. Therefore Kessler > GGG @168.
You don't rate guys based on a fantasy / make believe perception.

 

I've never seen people continue to rate a fighter so highly after he's come up short time after time.

If you think GGG loses to much smaller Canelo but beats Carl Froch, Mikkel Kessler etc you are probably suffering some kind of serious brain injury.

 

It was a one sided W

 

Golovkin automatically looses because he never fought at the weight?
I look at skills, tactic, technique. I would easily pick Golovkin over Kessler.
Golovkin is a proven P4P operator, Kessler was a good SMW(an historically average division)

 

Not it wasn't. Murray gave him hell throughout.

 

Murray won like 2 rounds

 

And the round he did not win, he had lots of success in.
He gave Groves a though fight.
But based on this BS size theory, he shouldn't have been able to do so.

 

There are other factors at play. Murray was huge at 160 and most likely more comfortable at SMW. We know how unreliable triangle theories are.

 

I think Froch would have a good chance to beat GGG.. Jermaine Taylor no. he would get stopped like he did with most guys. GGG against Nigel Benn? I think Benn beats him.