Thoughts on Canelo-GGG II

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Sep 19, 2018.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,831
    29,281
    Jun 2, 2006
    A mate of mine is in the DR he goes to the Carribean a lot.Ill get a scouting report from him.He was in Cartegena last year and said its very nice.Have a great vacation.
     
    surfinghb likes this.
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    I thought Round 2 was an easy Canelo round. He landed the cleaner, harder punches for sure, had better defense, and was the effective aggressor, etc. You guys might be the only people I’ve seen score it for Golovkin.
     
  3. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,692
    9,898
    Jun 9, 2010
    It would have been incompetent, if they had scored it to Golovkin, on the basis of 30 seconds.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,385
    48,758
    Mar 21, 2007
    Right, but that has absolutely no bearing on what I was saying. You're responding to my reply to you where my first scorecard was concerned with statistics concerning the second.

    Right, but you are only banging on about them. You are talking endlessly about the infirmity of cards that don't match yours for reasons of bias while ignoring the fact that that the reverse is true.




    Indeed they do - but one wouldn't think so in reading your posts. Reading your posts, there has been a conspiracy that stretches as far as the media even though the media agrees with you.

    I'm not sure what you're trying to say, or what it would mean if I did agree. I think that an overwhelming percentage of media issue cards they feel are reasonable. Why wouldn't they? But that's the point. When Thomas Hauser issues a card for Bradley in Bradley-Pacquiao I it isn't due to inherent bias or his being paid off or due to wider loyalties which are things you seem to suggest. It's because he believes in it.

    In case you're not picking up on it, this is also true or judges, is the point.

    I would say this though: with so many 114-114 cards out there - i've never seen so many - I can't see a 114-113 Canelo card as being "wrong".

    Compubox is awful.

    Team GGG signed off on every judge in the judging pool. All of them.

    You are - presumably intentionally - missing the point.

    Some of the media guys have pointed out that they didn't feel able to properly score the fight from where they were sitting. Given the colossal stock you are putting in media scorecards, I thought this would be of interest to you.

    As i've already demonstrated, that is incorrect.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,637
    9,690
    Jul 15, 2008
    I also found fault with the logic that Canelo fought coming forward into the "puncher" so made the fight. GGG as a near 37 war old fighter made strategic decisions on how to fight Canelo. To start claiming from almost the opening round that the story of the fight was all about Canelo coming forward was bizarre to me .. GGG , who many including the Canelo team claimed was nothing more than a stupid one dimensional fighter changed strategy and showed he could fight Canelo from outside and outbox him. GGG showed a lot of diversification in his game and that is to his credit.

    It was a competitive fight for sure but I feel GGG clearly outpointed him, won more rounds and dominated the last half of the fight. He also was the only fighter to seriously rock the other fighter. HBO's handling of the coverage and post fight airbrushing was deeply disturbing, I cannot remember one longtime champion , not Holmes or Hagler, lose in such a matter and be dismissed like Kellerman and Lampley did to GGG, calling Canelo an all time great middleweight .... it all looks like an obvious pile on for the $ and it reaks.
     
    BobD99 and BCS8 like this.
  6. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,692
    9,898
    Jun 9, 2010
    Agreed. One of the best shots of the fight in there, from Canelo, and some great body punching getting underneath Golovkin's guard. It probably didn't help that Lampley was calling shots for Golovkin that were clearly hitting Canelo's gloves; the opposite of what he was doing in the first round, when he was calling landed shots of Canelo's, as having been blocked (...come to think of it, I could have just as easily scored the first round for Canelo).
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,524
    81,998
    Aug 21, 2012
    I took into account scoring punches and how effective they were. I've got no problem in picking a jab over a power shot if the jab snaps the other guy's head back and the power shot is grazing or thrown half-hearted.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,320
    45,481
    Apr 27, 2005
    x3

    All 3 judges went for Canelo too.
     
  9. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,692
    9,898
    Jun 9, 2010
    These were few and far between.
     
    Bokaj and mrkoolkevin like this.
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,588
    Jan 30, 2014
    Right, but Canelos body blows were clearly much harder than Golovkins jabs imo. The jabs were mostly pretty ineffective, inaccurate punches without much on them. Which is why Canelo looked fine after the fight despite supposedly eating so many jabs from a monstrous puncher. Golovkin had a very hard time solving Canelo’s defense.
     
    Man_Machine, Bokaj and JohnThomas1 like this.
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,524
    81,998
    Aug 21, 2012
    You put this better than I could.

    Personally I was disgusted by the contrast in opinions between the first fight and this one. Canelo was virtually running backwards in some spots and he got trapped on the ropes in others. The Canelistas made sure to emphasise how much defence counted and how important it was that Canelo made Golovkin miss.

    In the rematch Golovkin was the one that moved back more - but NEVER on the scale of Canelo in the first fight - and he made Canelo miss wildly. I hear not a peep from anybody praising his defence and talking about how inept he made Canelo look.

    I don't mind giving Canelo credit for standing his ground and fighting with heart.

    I DO mind giving Canelo GGG's belts as a kind of participation award, though.
     
    BobD99 likes this.
  12. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,692
    9,898
    Jun 9, 2010
    I've just seen this line:

    "
    This content is protected
    "


    That's a pile, right there!

    Since when did Compubox score defense and ring generalship? The service (or disservice) can barely count clean, hard punches correctly.
     
    PhillyPhan69, Rumsfeld and Bokaj like this.
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,385
    48,758
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, a couple of the first six are total swing rounds, awful to score. Canelo clearly won that one though.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  14. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,524
    81,998
    Aug 21, 2012
    Canelo's body blows weren't as hard as you imagine, since Golovkin picked up the pace at the exact same time when those body blows should have been slowing him down. Clearly they were not effective. Whether that's due to Canelo not punching hard enough or whether that's due to Golovkin having an iron core is, I guess, up for debate. But what I can say is that GGG was never hurt and Canelo was clearly rocked.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,385
    48,758
    Mar 21, 2007
    This is an interesting way of scoring fights. I don't find it ridiculous, but it's clearly not in the rules.

    Judges don't retrospectively score body punching.