Stupid *****. I suppose when Mikey beats Loma you'll say no credit, because Loma is past prime... Suck a dick *****
He shouldn't have been fighting him at all. It's the equalivent of fighting Shannon Briggs post ped ban and calling it a great win.
Instead of say takam or molina when he was champion far removed from 8-0 Why not? Bottom line he waited for povetkn to age and got exposed by a 39 year old.
Foreman hasn't fought in the last 20 years, Wladimir an all time great won one fight at 39, and lost two. Highlights the point well.
Point is they're all past prime and still competing at a high level, are you that dense? How many actual wars has this guy been in, besides the Huck fight? HHe looked as good as ever at 39 and his age shouldn't be talked about like that was the reasoning behind his defeat. You EE fans know your fighters turn pro late and by the time they reach the top they're 35+ years old and the moment they lose a fighter in their prime, the age factor is the only excuse to make? Lol
Soft touches vs who? Wilder? 40 fights before a decent test? Hahahaha come on man, I enjoy whiskey also, but come on...at some point you have to put the bottle down.
Not at all. Ttheres older guys in boxing that preform better than guys that are younger than their opponent. Look at Hopkins vs Pavlik, JMM VS Diaz, ... I hate that guys like you are inept to the fact that there's plenty of boxing icons who have competed on the highest levels time after time again. GGG and Povetkin lose and it's they're old. When Loma loses will that be your excuse too?
So just to clarify. You don't think a boxer being 40 year olds matters whatsoever. You think a boxer is still in their prime at this age?
Also makes it clear that both would of won if younger even with both giving up huge height advantage.