Where would a prime Frank Bruno rank among today`s Top 10 heavies?

Much as he did in his own era.

He would steer clear of them for the most part, and get mixed results when it became unavoidable to fight them.

 

Without a doubt top 8

 

He’d beat Parker.

Kownacki and Breazeale would be live underdogs. Let’s say he splits those.

Whyte probably finds a way to win, but it’s far from a sure thing.

The rest probably knock him out except for Tyson, who decisions him.

So I’d say he does surprisingly bad.

 

He'd be in the middle of them i'd say without too much thought.

 

1. AJ
Loss. Knocks him out with some ease

2. Wilder
Win. He would beat Wilder by KO, as he had some real boxing skill to go with his power. Both are chinny, so no advantage either way there.

3. Povetkin
Loss. Povetkin knocks him out in mid rounds

4. Ortiz
Win. Ortiz of a few years ago would knock him out early, but he is now an old guy with health issues.

5. Whyte
Loss. Whyte outguts him. Decision or very late knock out.

6. Parker
Possible win. Frank can win this one, due to being bigger, heavier handed, and a better boxer. Then again, Parker has some guts and a beard, so it is tough to say.

7. Fury
Loss. Fury Outboxes with with ease.

8. Breazeale
Win. Not really sure what Breazeale does well. Bruno outboxes him and stops him late.

9. Kownacki
Loss. Kownacki swarms and eventually stops him, in one of the most comical contrasts ever of a body beautiful and good boxer who nonetheless has a poor chin and stamina, against a fat guy who is tough and throws a lot of punches.

10. Miller
Loss, but toughest one for me to call. I respect Miller a lot for fighting everyone and finding paths to victories, but like Breazeale, he just doesn't impress. I will say Miller on pure balls.

 

Very much as he did in his actual own era I reckon. Fury, AJ and Wilder probably beat him ,He may have slight success against certain top twenty guys but that's as high as he gets. He'd always have that dangerous ,heavy Punch but I don't believe it takes him to the very top.

 

He'd be a champ. Bruno had better skills than Wilder or Joshua. He just happened to come along during Prime and very close to prime Tyson.

 

Well I'd take Oliver McCall to beat anyone Joshua has faced, and he would go at least 5-5 against Joshua in my opnion . Bruno beat McCall. Bruno fought better competition that simple. Bruno gets judged harshly because in his biggest fights he lost. But he loss against Witherspoon, ( a very good fighter) against a prime Tyson ( Who was fighting at ATG level when they 1st fought) and Lewis( Lewis an ATG in prime) I'll say this, if Joshua faced Bruno's competition, he wouldn't be undeafeated. Probably never been heard of. I haven't seen anything from Joshua that says he's more than average. But his competition has been beyond below average. That may make him look good to you, your welcome to your opnion. But mine is he's lucky to be fighting in a time of a sport that has fallen severely off, and slowly dying.