CST80 there is no point in me even trying to make a point against you, everyone knows you are ultra-pro anything anti-AJ/Hearn. Your bias is on another level. Don't ban me for voicing my opinion please.
No, I was a fan of Ortiz before, and still am, quite frankly I like Ortiz more than I do Wilder. Even though I picked Wilder to beat Ortiz, it gutted me to seem him lose. I hate Haymon far more than I dislike Hearn, I don't have any kind of agenda against Hearn, I like the majority of the fighters he represents, Kell Brook is one of my favorites period. No one is banning anyone for voicing their opinion, otherwise I'd have banned that paid shill Opinion of a Casual 6 months ago. Here's the proof Ortiz is 39. This fat **** is 38, and a week younger than me. This content is protected Cubans clearly age terribly.
Wlad from jennings fight was past prime but still much better than wlad from joshua fight . Jennings gave wlad a good fight , but ortiz would have knocked that version of wlad out.
I missed the part where he actually states AJ is "ducking" anyone. How do you feel that your idol says AJ is the A-side?
He is the A-side. But he's also ducking just like Lewis said. If he wanted the fight, it would have happened.
You are right , but I remember we were in miami and my ex once told me that cubans look like normal men, not juiced up NY guineas . And I was juicing back then haha
No, Joshua would still have the better resume. You don't wipe out almost a decade of fighting soft touches with 2 fights especially when those 2 fights were picked against 2 opponents who have looked unimpressive in recent performances. Wilder wasn't calling out Ortiz when he had just KO'ed Jennings, he fought him after looking old vs Scott and Allen. He didn't call out Fury before his inactivity and weight gain, he only made the fight after he saw Fury look bad vs Seferi and to a lesser extent Pianeta. Had both looked good in recent fights, would he of fought them? It's clear Wilder is developing a pattern in regards to facing top fighters, he's picking off the weak ones in the pack, the ones who look old or vulnerable. Joshua in comparison fought Wlad as soon as his options with Haymon were done, unified with Parker once he didn't have any mandatory obligations and just fought Povetkin an opponent Wilder ran from when given a chance.
Wilder's opposition thus far has been sub-par. Ortiz included. A massive disservice to Povetkin to suggest Ortiz is the same level. Wilder's and Ortiz's records are both a shaky house of cards, to be toppled easily at the first hint of impartial scrutiny. Joshua, for all his perceived faults, has a solid résumé already and looks keen to add to it. No contest.