How long does Floyd Patterson hold the title with Vitali Klitschko as his brother?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Oct 3, 2018.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Assume that these two prime heavyweights coordinate their efforts to match Vitali against the toughest opponents for Floyd. It starts after Patterson beats Moore.

    How long does Floyd hold the title?
     
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    I don't think Liston beating Vitali is out of the question.
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    no change.

    one look at liston and vitali would be all "sorry, brother, i go retire, bad shoulder, gotta go get elected" and run back to kiev.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2018
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  4. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    Not long after Liston slaughters Vitali
     
  5. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,066
    8,748
    Aug 15, 2018
    I’m not sure Liston wins but damn interesting matchup. Who backs up who there? I guess I can see it going something like Lennox v Vitali?
     
  6. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    A few early thoughts.

    Vitali is close to his best from 1999 to 2004, roughly 5 years. Patterson wins the title in 1956 and loses it to Liston in 1962.

    Vitali's first retirement from injuries comes about 5 years in to his peak form. That means it happens around 1961. Liston's best qualifying fights for the title come in 1960.

    So ironically, Vitali may indeed get injured and take his first retirement right at the point where Patterson needs him to knock Liston off the docket.

    This is especially ironic because it's the stretch when he could have helped out Wladimir in real life. (And because Rahman is a very Listonesque heavyweight.) For the record, I think Vitali beats Liston if he fights him healthy and in his prime. But that probably doesn't happen in this scenario.

    Vitali comes back four years later. That puts it in 1965 territory. He stays around 4 more years. Say 1969 ish.

    I don't think Vitali can help Patterson against Ali, since old Vitali would probably lose to Ali as well. And even if he beat Ali, it's not like he can give the title to Patterson.

    That means that old Vitali's best use is during the heavyweight tournament during the latter 60s, after Ali's retirement. Unfortunately, there are just too many fighters in this tournament who can beat Patterson. Quarry, Ellis, and Frazier are all favorites against Patterson, based on either their abilities or actual performances against Floyd, and Vitali can't fight them all. Also, I think prime Frazier beats old Vitali in a very ugly fight.

    Patterson's only hope is to rush to make a match between Vitali and Liston in 1960 or 1961. Unfortunately, Patterson isn't a fortune teller. He's got Ingo keeping him busy until 1961, and he probably thinks he's safe to wait for Vitali to beat Liston in late 1961 or early 1962.

    So strangely enough, adding an elite modern superheavyweight to Patterson's team may accomplish exactly nothing for his career.
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    wtf is this "adding someon to my team BS anyway, Patterson was in a time when a man won his own title and fight, not cried to his bro, or relied on his bro to beat a retired failure". Patterson would not even defend against a retired failure!
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    It's the topic of the thread.

    Wait, which retired failure did Patterson duck?
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    well i guess, ok.

    but its not the Patterson way.
     
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    True, though I don't think D'Amato would have a problem doing it, considering he matched Patterson against Rademacher.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,552
    27,180
    Feb 15, 2006
    This is random!
     
  12. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Thoughts on whether it would help?
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,552
    27,180
    Feb 15, 2006
    I will cut to your next point.

    No, I do not think that it was a major aid to Wlad.

    Wlad was fighting the guys ranked in the top half of the top ten, while Vitally was fielding his mandatories who were mostly ranked in the lower half of the top ten, or outside the top ten.

    They both got a slice of the pie, but Wlad fielded every dangerous challenge.

    Now in Floyd Patterson's case, yes it probably would have helped him to have a 6' 7'' older brother to look after him!
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Well spotted.

    Yes, I began with the idea of evaluating whether it helped Wlad, using Patterson as a comparison case.

    At this point, though, I think the question is interesting for its own sake. Vitali's tendency to get injured, combined with Patterson's career trajectory, may actually prevent Vitali from helping Patterson very much.