Lennox Lewis watched the fight with Vitali Klitschko “About 30 Times,” Says Klitschko Was His “

One can not lose a political election behind in the vote with doctor stopping it. Bad analogy. But you're right on Hillary supporters.

 

I'll answer it McGrain,

Please read and reflect.

1 ) There is always demand for a re-match in a heavyweight good fight as they are rare on the highest levels. The 1990's were full of them at heavyweight. Holy vs. Bowe, Tyson vs. Holy, Moorer vs. Holy, Lewis vs McCall. etc...

2 ) Bruno was very popular in the UK. Are you telling me his fan base would not want to see him get another crack at Lewis, considering how well he was doing? Are you telling me the purses would not be big for this fight?

3) Bruno obviously did not retire after this loss, he went on to win a few more, including a win over Oliver McCall, who stopped Lewis. So with a win over the man who beat Lewis that was unavenged at the time, plus a loss to Lewis in a close fight, there are some paths here for them to meet again.

4 ) Calls for Bruno to retire you say? Maybe so. My retort, obviously he did not listen, facing and beating McCall, and then meeting Tyson in his last fight.

5 ) Who did Lewis face in 1994-1995? Phil Jackson, Oliver McCall, Lionel Butler ,Justin Fortune, Tommy Morrison. Bruno would have been a bigger draw than most of these matches.

6 ) Did Bruno ever say he wouldn't fight Lewis again? Show me if he did. When a big purse if up, fighters often take it.

7 ) Many in the USA at the time did not care for Lewis, and would have watched to see if he lost. There was demand here.

As I said before, Lewis was eager for re-matches when he lost, however when he was in tough fights that he won, we never saw a re-match with the following fighters. There is a pattern here:

Bruno, Mercer, Mavrovic, and Klitschko. All four of these men gave Lewis tough fights. I read Lewis collapsed in his dressing room after Mavrovic fight.

I think there would have been demand for ANY of the above re-matches.