Michael Spinks vs Bob Foster At LHW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Mar 14, 2016.

  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,930
    Likes Received:
    44,785
    Are you really this clueless or are you just a troll?
     
  2. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    4,805
    Likes Received:
    148
    go back and learn something
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,930
    Likes Received:
    44,785
    Claiming 175 pound Spinks does not have one punch KO power is one of the most absurd comments i have ever read on any forum, not just boxing. How could you ever expect to be taken seriously :good
     
    Flash24 likes this.
  4. Westwind7

    Westwind7 New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2018
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    9
    Spinks beats Foster in all categories except punching power. His speed, defensive skills and volume of punches he dishes out stop Foster via TKO in the late rounds. I believe Yaqui Lopez at his best had the ability to beat Foster as well
     
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    15,591
    Probably the 2 best LHWs of my lifetime. Not much difference between them as was said above, with Foster holding a slight edge in both. I just see Spinks as the better boxer who will be able to force the distance and pace of the fight controlling both. I look for Spinks to take a decision, unless Bob presses the action to much, then I think Michael stops him
     
  6. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Messages:
    8,273
    Likes Received:
    7,017
    This. Michael Spinks was a very talented fighter, but Foster fought much better competition than Spinks and most likely lays him out in the later rounds.
     
  7. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    15,591
    I would say Qawi and Gregory are better than anything on Fosters resume at LHW, and I might pick Qawi over Foster
     
    NoNeck likes this.
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    26,764
    Likes Received:
    17,825
    Spinks ko.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,930
    Likes Received:
    44,785
    Foster had one of the greatest jabs in history and it's definitely better than Spinks. I'd also rate his handspeed above Michael, Foster could really whip those punches out there.
     
  10. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    15,591
    Interesting thought on the jab. I always thought of thier jabs in a lens of Liston/Holmes. Hard to say whose was better? They utilize them different but both accomplish what thier styles need. I think of Foster as one that is a weapon but also deters crowding and controls space. Whereas I see Spinks as the quicker jab using in to control both space and pace...not sure I see ones jab as substantially better
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,930
    Likes Received:
    44,785
    Spinks has a fine jab but for me Foster's jab is absurdly good. I see it as one of the great p4p jabs personally. He's also for me the greatest hitter in history at 175. Heck he might be the greatest hitter p4p too. Not only can he knock you cold with one punch but if need be he can also accumulate and wear you down without getting frustrated like some huge bangers did. It's a great match.
     
    Longhhorn71, Flash24 and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  12. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2017
    Messages:
    11,663
    Likes Received:
    17,942
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,745
    Likes Received:
    29,126
    Foster for me but it might go the distance.Spinks wasn't easy to nail.
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,457
    Likes Received:
    9,446
    I'm not sure .. both guys could really fight but I really don't remember Foster tested at 175 too much .. Michael could really box and fight but he was in wars at 175 against Johnson while it lasted, Yaqui Lopez, Eddie Davis was a tough one .. Foster was the type of fight that could decapitate you with a shot .. just not sure here ..