I've actually never made a top ten at bantam before to see where I'd rank Zarate. I do rate him very highly and instinctually imagined that he'd probably be close to the top, but the division is so stacked that it's fair to have him in the lower half of the top ten now I think on it. Great piece again Flea. I'm guessing that the forthcoming articles will further explain your rationale for Zarate's ranking. Btw, I meant to say earlier that I'm really glad to see your stuff in print in a widely known publication. I've long thought that many of the best historians in recent years have come to the fore online in the forums rather than in the mainstream.; this forum was once a great point of congregation for many of them. It's great to see the alumni getting their stuff in print. Same for McGrain and others. Also, major respect for managing to squirrel into the narrative the herculean talents of the demi-god also known as Borkhorsor. Martinez was an excellent fighter and that win was no joke at all. I'm eager as feck to see the rest of the list now, to see if there are other 'surprises'. Could it be that Jofre (nor Olivares) doesn't sit at the zenith like nearly everyone thinks? You don't have to answer that.
Thanks for this thoughtful post mate. Of course I will find space to mention Borkorsor somewhere! Hmmm....Who knows who will sit at the top? I’m not the outlandish type, I’ll say that much. And if anyone is lower than many will anticipate, hopefully my reasoning will explain it.
Just in case you think I’ve gome quiet, it’s by design! The eighth ranked bantam will be posted tomorrow. The seventh on Thursday, and the sixth on Friday. Then the top 5 will be revealed daily next week. Hopefully even if you find yourself disagreeing with the rankings you’ll enjoy reading them and hopefully can learn something from them. For those more clued up on the lower weights, if I can teach you one new thing or get you to think about a certain aspect of these great fighters from a different angle I’ll be happy! Some really f’n great fighters from here on out.
The UK is 5 hours ahead of USA Eastern Time, meaning its close to 9:00 PM in the UK. There is a way for a sneak peak if you know how web addresses work, but I'm not going to talk about it With a surprise call at #10, and #9 being what most people would view in the top 5, #8 becomes more interesting.
Tomorrow now...and no.7 on Friday! Sorry, although 8 didn’t require much in the way of editing (my editors words!) he has been backed up with other stuff....so we get no.8 tomorrow! Hope it’s worth the wait. For what it’s worth, no.7 (Friday) was one of my favourites to write. Hopefully it’s as fun to read!
Great articles and I'm definitely learning a lot.. It is appreciated! Good to see you mention R. Marquez here. He was a better boxer than his brother imo .. well at least for the first 10 years he was … Curious where you have him placed all time .. thanks .. or is it not really set in stone for you ,, just 21 -30
Probably like....25th or something. If the Veeraphol fight had happened he might’ve been much, much higher.
And number eight is..... https://www.boxingmonthly.com/all-t...ntamweights-of-all-time-no-8-panama-al-brown/
Another good read and solid addition! Panama Al Brown, I think he was around 5 when I did a list a few years back, and was expecting to see him in the 4-6 range. Not critiquing your placement, just slightly surprised. You did give a good balanced line of reasoning...so many great bantams at this stage that there really is very little separating them.
Two things: Yes, certainly hard to separate the top 10. But really hard to separate them from—in my opinion at least—15-8 and 7-1. Second thing; If it seems that Zarate and Brown are a bit low, it will become apparent why when you read the rest of the write-ups. For example, no.7 is a beast, and could easily be no.1. It’s not at all easy to rank any of the 3 we’ve already covered above him though IMO.