He’d get more credit if he fought away from vegas imo,regardless of opponent if he can win in style away from home it would negate any bad feeling about the opponent imo.
Neither Floyd nor Canelo were confident of legitimately winning a fight unless it was in Vegas They were sure of "victory" there
Bull feces. Floyd beat Maidan both times, first fight was closer. Only fightER who has an absolute argument on beating Floyd is Jose Luis Castillo in the first fight. Enough said on that subject. As far as Canelo goes, it was a close fight with Lara, but Lara ran for most of the fight and Canelo was Tagging that body. Landed clean uppers upstairs and played the role of the aggressor while be effective at the same time. Trout was close as well but the KD is what tipped it to Canelos favor, but that fight happened in Texas not vegas, remember where Margarito fought Perez in the first fight? Brahahaha
So why is GGG, the loser, at 36, supposed to fight Charlo as a mandatory? Canelo should be clamoring to fight Charlo. After all, they are the same age, and GGG lost to Canelo.
If Canelo beat Lara then Floyd lost most of his fights all he did was run hold run hold I was at most of Tony's fights back then I relied on memory you have no memories so ypu use Box rec lol
Fielding has a title belt and therefore is considered a 3rd divisional title for Canelo whether you like it or not.
Fuuck boxrec. Im a real boxing aficianado and is really involved in the sport of boxing. You're an old senile man and have no memory of anything except of losing your virginity at the age of 55... Now go look for your "memorabilia" because I've been waiting 2 years to see it!
Try to stay alert. That post wasn't in reference to fighting Fielding. It had to do with Canelo ducking Charlo and the rest at MW.