Emile Griffith (Rodriguez version) vs Duran (Leonard version). (Note: Griffith was stronger than SRL at welter).
Intruiging match up, Griffith was very strong with an excellent chin,he wasn't a dynamite puncher.Would Duran be too busy? I'd like to hear some more opinions on this fight.Whoever won ,it would be by decision.
A more 'versatile boxer'? Are you daft? Benitez-Duran comes to mind. Roberto was top flight at welter but his legacy is built on his LW career. IMO no way Duran stops a welter Emile. And the 'heavier puncher' thing...may be true but look at Griffith's KO% AFTER Paret. I'll take Emile on a UD with no one complaining. My $0.02
For anyone who doesn't know Emile, and wants to learn... One of the best boxing documentary's ever. This content is protected
Some info: "In 1963 and 1964, Griffith was voted Fighter of the Year by The Ring magazine and the Boxing Writers Association of America. In 2002, he was listed #33 on Ring Magazine's list of 80 greatest fighters of the past 80 years.[5] Griffith currently ranks #20 in BoxRec's ranking of the greatest pound for pound boxers of all time.[6] But many boxing fans believed he was never quite the same fighter after Paret's death. From the Paret bout to his retirement in 1977, Griffith fought 80 bouts but only scored twelve knockouts. He later admitted to being gentler with his opponents and relying on his superior boxing skills, because he was terrified of killing someone else in the ring."
This is a really tough call but a terrific matchup. The Duran that beat Palomino and Leonard was the real deal at welterweight, but Griffith competed in the division for 10 years and was almost a complete fighter there (lack of KOs aside). That it goes the distance is a given. In a three fight series, I lean towards Griffith (2-1). In a one off, Duran could upset Emile. I really don't know on this one!
What is this? You obviously know nothing about Emile Griffith. Griffith and Duran...at welterweight were about on par, punching-wise....at welter, don't mistake Duran for the killer he was at lightweight. Griffith was extremely strong...far in excess of Duran, and was a consummate ring mechanic...in his career, both at welter and middle, he could "outbox the sluggers and outpunch and outstrength the boxers"...the definition of a ring mechanic. He became more patient, and tooled his fighting style to being a boxer...boring the daylights out of fans and foes alike...but so what? The very best, the most effective ring mechanics and scientists tended to be that way. To be charitable to Duran, I'd say that if Griff wasn't at his absolute best, Roberto could cop a decision, but I'd bet real money that the rematch and probably the rubber match would go to Griffith. Ko Griffith???? No bloody way that would happen...and the chances for Duran would diminish even more at middleweight, btw,...where I think EG became an even greater fighter...as witnessed by his stunning upset of the strongest middleweight champ of all,..Dlck Tiger...decking the anvil jawed Tiger for the first time in his career in round 9...not a puncher, you say?