Good article on Golovkin

Now this is the classic reply from a troll that DKSAB & cannot find a legitimate excuse for his idols Peds abuse

 

My right coroted pinky toe nail knows more about baxing than you. #facts

 

Why is it I keep getting nightmares of Oscar, Clenelo, IsaL, Shadow, drenlou & El Chicano lined up like a blubbery version of the Radio City Rockettes or the Tiller girls. With PimpC cheering them on ROFL

 

Hope someone can re-post what I said until someone can find something wrong with it. It would kill off most of the stupid arguments that aren't being created over most fights.

 

Your ludicrous posts prove otherwise go read boxing 101 & get judgng lessons from Adelaide Byrd lol

 

He did drop Kovalev, bodyshot.

 

I'm interested in where GGG goes from here. Power & chin are still there.

Conceivably, he could box for another 2-3 years.

He beats the Charlos, Murata, Andrade, Saunders etc.

 

Coming from such humble background and given he lost two brothers to an awful war it’s totally understandable.
You know what gets me about though about those two fights?how Golovkins mantra was about bringing respect back into boxing,tainted meat thing aside both guys did bring some respect back to the sport,such a pity the judges ect didn’t go along with the script.
A mate of mine said “should these judges listen to the commentary teams to help em decide”lol I told him he was presuming they were no good at their job but the truth is they did their job as they made sure the cash cow “future of boxing”drew and won both fights,in other words had Golovkin rightfully been given the first fight it would of scuppered the rematch........the sport stinks imo if one can choose a massive payday over glory.

Whilst Canelo and Golovkin put on a clinic for the sport,those in power have done their best to make the sport look corrupt once again.

 

Ydksab

Tell me again why you think GGG won? He landed a couple more jabs per round? Lmao

 

Legit as in that’s what the judges decided,legitimately though given what the majority thought both decisions will be remembered as home cooked decisions,such is boxing.

I know we were never gonna get another draw but one can see how bad the sport is when you see the cash cow given all the excuses to hand him a draw in the first fight and lets just say Golovkin was beaten by the same margin in the second fight(which he wasn’t)why would they not do the same?probably cause two wrongs don’t make a right.
Both guys get my respect re of judges as they are the ones risking their lives at the end of the day.

 

THE State Commissions do not try to hide their corruption. Why should they there is no one supervising them they make their own rules and change them to suit their purpose. Its worse now than in the 50]a with the mob. fans know the corruption is rampant but still flock like lemmings to buy the crooked PPV'S

 

Both fights were close and in the future when all the hysterical drama is removed people will be able to see them for what they were, two really good competitive fights that could have gone either way depending on what you're looking for. NO ROBBERIES!

 

Yep you’re right and given how various networks called the fight and thought Golovkin won both, to state commissions it doesn’t matter one bit to em.