Who are the Top 8 P4P fighters in the game today?

1. Loma
2. Crawford
3. Usyk
4. Canelo
5. GGG
6. Inoue
7. SRR
8. Garcia
9. Nietes
10. Tanaka

with Joshua, Hurd, Santa Cruz, Spence, & Thurman hovering outside

 

Canelo was humiliated against a 36 yr old and was soundly beaten. If you don't rate Joshua's win over Povetkin that highly, which is fair enough, but canelo has struggled in other fights and scored a draw in fight that was a robbery. He should really have at least 2 L's on his record.

 

1. GGG is lucky he's in any top p4p list to begin with. He has the weakest resume out of any p4p inductee, his last(only) meaningful win came back in 2017 against a former cancer patient.

2. Don't care about what any of the crybaby nerds in this forum or what casuals think. Most people don't know **** about boxing to begin with and can't score a fight properly. Canelo won, deal with it. Now GGG has no belts, a big fat L on his record and is almost on his way towards to retirement, he's also scared to fight Charlo which would be the biggest win in his career.

3. These other fighters I mentioned above have climbed up at least one weight class to dominate, barring Rung who is sitting on his wins against former p4p 1 Roman Gonzalez, Usyk(undisputed, something GGG has never done.... matter fact all the belts he has had before has been gifted to him, while Usyk took all his belts from the reigning champs) and Spence.

4. In conclusion, an old man with no belts, loss on his record with a dog **** poor resume belongs nowhere near the top of the p4p list. The fact that he was p4p 1 before the Canelo loss is laughable actually. In the entire HISTORY of boxing, I've never met another man weasel his way towards the top of the p4p lists like GGG has with such a poor record/resume. Mayweather, Gonzales, Pacquaio, Hopkins, Roy Jones Jr, Shane Mosley, Trinidad, Oscar DLH, Pernell Whitaker, Chavez, Tyson, Leonard, Hagler, etc.... All of these guys earned their p4p top spots, they never feasted on bums and waited for handouts like GGG has his entire career.

 

So why have you got Spence above him?

 

Because he's undefeated, passes the eye test and considered the top dog at WW, the most stacked division in boxing.

 

But he has a far worse resume than Golovkin, isn't arguably the best in his division and has only just won a title.

Obviously you only hold GGG to such standards, if you are going to have such you need to abide all fighters by them.

Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

 

Considered the top dog despite not fighting any of the top dogs bar a broken and maybe weight drained Brook in a fight he was arguably losing.

Eye test obviously trumps record KO streak, 2nd most defences, being avoided during your prime, cleaning out a division....

But hey ho.

 

I'll see your Brook and raise you a Klitschko.