Wilder #1 Heavyweight IF beats Fury

Davo your a c u n t end of.

 

Yep, unfortunately just as i’d feared.

I apologies for picking up on your post as quite clearly you’re a custard short of a pudding.

On a serious note though, I’d suggest asking your parents to keep an eye on your internet usage - it needs reigning in. Either that, or just have a little break. It might just do you the world of good.

Good luck, fella (apologies if you’re a woman).

 

Ah Davo. You patronise me for pointing out a small gap is not a big gap then offer some sort of bs olive branch? I expected a more consistent, staunch approach to your trolling but perhaps I'm setting the bar unreasonably high.
I definitely appreciate your commitment to the cause but feel free to be more insulting to me, I'd hate to think you felt the need to swap some humour for cordiality.
Please continue with utter dismissal of any reason or sense I might be speaking, it's more entertaining for others that way.

I certainly will enjoy the Wilder V Fury fight thanks, only on 2 conditions:
1) it actually happens
2) they don't stand and look at each other for extended periods

Fingers crossed on both counts

 

You seem to be a little slow, so I will try to make this easier for you.
Fury as you say is unbeaten, he relinquished his belts due to inactivity which includes his lineal title. If you think just because he has come back that him not being defeated inside the ring still gives him a claim to the lineal title you are very WRONG. Lets say Lennox came back to fight, he retired as Lineal champ so using your logic Lennox would be Lineal.

 

Again, you've never once explained what your original point was supposed to be. Wilder and Fury both have significantly better records than AJ. I've been extremely clear on that point. I hope whatever issue you seemed to be having is now cleared up.

In answer to your silly list:

1) It's On
2) This isn't Parker and AJ. Wilder Fury are the legit #1 & #2 in the division. Please don't think the bore fests that AJ has with other paper champions will have any bearing at all on the Wilder-Fury Mega Event.

 

Again, people dragging out their alts to insult me personally because they lost the argument on their main account. There's just no need for it. No need at all.

Wilder-Fury is on! The true boxing fans out there can't wait til December One to find out who the real king is at HW!

 

Getting personal again and again. There's no need. Fury and Wilder for all the Marbles. IT'S ON!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Fury and Wilder have better records than AJ?? are you a coke head? both their records are absolutely pathetic.

 

The bum-crusher supreme Wilder vs the fat bum Fury for a golden plastic statue in front of McD's.

Only the most naive muppet thinks that anybody except Wilder is winning this and that it means anything in the context of the current HW scene ... which is dire, btw.

 

Next up : JORGE KAHWAGI vs WILLIAM BEZZERRA for ALLLLL the marbles!

Two undefeated monsters going at it!!!!!

The winner gets SVEN OTTKE in Germany!!!!!!!!



Oh, yeah.

 

Again, casual Brits getting personal and patronising instead of actually presenting an argument.

I've said this again and again and nobody has an argument against it, but here it is one more time just for you:

Looking at Marquee wins:

Fury clearly has a better record than AJ. That's not even up for debate. How could AJ's Wlad win, where he got outboxed and nearly sparked out ever be compared to The Furious One's?!?!? AJ went life and death with an older version, coming off a loss, fighting away from home, on a rival show, etc. The Gypsy King went to Germany and won every round against a dominant champ version of Wlad. It's over right there.

Wilder clearly has a better record than AJ. Ortiz was unbeaten and the boogeyman of the division. AJ had ducked Ortiz himself in the past. Wilder KO'd a man who'd never even looked vulnerable to a loss and who AJ used his promoter to duck and hide from, much like he's now doing with Wilder. How can you now defend that a coward like AJ deserves more credit for beating an older and heavily beaten former champ?

Ortiz > Loser Non-Champ Wlad
Ortiz >>>>> Paper Champ Parker

We don't even need to mention the likes of Old and un-roided midget Povetkin or Brit-level nobody Dillian Whyte, who also ducked Ortiz again and again.

Long story short, AJ's record falls at the first hurdle. His Marquee win is heavily tainted by his terrible performance and doesn't hold up to scrutiny on any level. AJ is a decent fighter. Legit #3 in the division and holder of 3 paper titles. There's nothing wrong with that at this stage of his career. If he want to be more than that, he will need to stop the has-been and bum carousel and fight the best.

 

Your lack of boxing knowledge is on display again. Wilder-Fury is a 50-50 fight and every real boxing fan knows it. Your Pro Mis-Matchroom agenda is obvious and it's not fooling anyone.

 

Wow, I've always had a low opinion of Wilder but if you think he's that **** then I've obviously been overrating him.

Must be my "lack of boxing knowedge" but I have no idea what you're on about.

Are you mainlining mum's mayo again?

 

Hornet is American iirc.

 

i am no brit. fury didn't do **** against wlad. they stared at each other. kenny norton beat the living **** outta ali and holmes and lost decisions. fury made faces and won a decision. fury is the biggest cherry picking ducker to ever live.