Jess Willards athletic background

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Oct 21, 2018.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    LOL!
     
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Why is it hard to believe that a heavyweight champion known for his strength and stamina was unusually athletic as a young man?

    It seems an oddly specific thing for an old Willard to lie about, and I've seen other figures like Rahman's 500 pound bench press accepted on these forums.

    What is our standard for doubting athletic performance figures provided by boxers themselves? I'm fine with whatever the standard is, provided we have a reason for it and it's applied consistently.
     
  3. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    I have my doubts about the veracity of those times and measurements posted by Samba... What is the source for those measurements?
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Almost 100% certain he made them up out of thin air to continue his trolling, and to see whether the people in this forum would be gullible enough to accept such completely unsourced, obviously anachronistic measurements.
     
  5. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,705
    4,253
    Jun 20, 2017
    can't believe anybody thought SambaKing was serious, he did it like the NFL Combine, somebody even jokingly asked about Willard's Wonderlic score...incredible!

    No, Willard was not a super athlete and there is no Easter Bunny, sorry if that disappoints...one would think that one look at Willard's build and movement would have been enough? If Willard broke 14 seconds on the 100 yard dash I'd be amazed.
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2018
    Seamus and mrkoolkevin like this.
  6. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    This is clearly just what Jess told the local journalists. His actual feats are much much higher.
     
    SambaKing1993 likes this.
  7. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,594
    Apr 9, 2017
    You don't seem to have noticed that the bait was not taken, and that if that was a troll post it demonstrated the exact opposite of what was intended.
    Your posts are consistently mindless.
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,593
    17,673
    Apr 3, 2012
    They're Brock Lesnar's scores.
     
    cross_trainer, Pat M and mrkoolkevin like this.
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Ha. Guess I was wrong about him making them up out of thin air.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  10. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Im calling bull****. Willard was big and strong but slow, clumsy, and uncoordinated as any professional athlete ever was.
     
  11. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    The references:

    https://i.imgur.com/slbTwZU.jpg
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,534
    46,103
    Feb 11, 2005
    What was Dempsey's time in the 3 cone drill?
     
    Pat M likes this.
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Not saying that the absence of any such evidence proves he wasn't very fast, but were there any first-hand accounts during his career of reporters or other observers who watched him run and were amazed by his speed? Unless I've missed something, it seems like all the references to Willard's speed come in the form of stories being told years after the fact.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,534
    46,103
    Feb 11, 2005
    He was fast enough to beat a prime Jack Johnson.
     
  15. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I doubt he was running at that level by the time he was 29.
    And he wasn't really being covered by the press in depth until 1915.
    Every piece of footage available on Jess Willard is when he was at least 34 years old.

    This is Willard at 29 starting his boxing career: https://i.imgur.com/Xb1sDJ9.jpg

    Also, between these athletic feats and being a professional boxer, he spent years being an entrepreneur and doing odd jobs when times got tough. He collected debts for people, and one time reportedly lifted a man by his legs and hung him upside down and shook the change out of his pockets. During this time he probably lost a step as a sprinter. But he came from the type of semi-pro athletic background, and roughneck background that many boxers came from.

    I don't see why this all seems unlikely. He did end up winning the HW title, and did so beating a handful of top professional boxers. This notion that he was some lazy farm boy who was picked to beat Johnson because he was a giant does have a little surface truth to it. But in order to have gotten in the sport as late as he did, being a top fighter in the sparring circuits, being a top fighter in Carl Morris's camp, and winning sanctioned boxing matches against the kind of opponents he did, it makes sense that there is more realistic nuance beneath the surface.
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2018