Forget resume, who is your top 3 p4p based off skill now right.

They are both high on the P4P charts, I just tried to explain my reasoning why I had Canelo higher. You can certainly make an argument for any of those guys to be #1.

 

i know, and your claim is not outrageous, its just not how i see it.

 

Loma
Crawford
Usyk

 

Not at all, he was caught coming in square on in a lack of concentration, in a fight he in turn stopped a very good opponent, who was not only skillfull in his own right but much bigger.

 

nomas, canelo, crawford.

bubbling under - 2slyk if he can build on supremacy in a diluted division, then hes in... garcia if he can recover to reach his former glory then hes in

 

So, like, if they are a bum basher outside the top 10 than still nobody can disagree?

^ That is why resume is not just everything, it's the only thing.

There is a reason the answers are all your guys among the best resumes anyway: Canelo, Crawford, Inoue, Lomachenko

 

1:usyk
2:loma
3:crawford

 

Can’t really co-sign any top three listing without these guys in it....(order really isn’t important)

 

This is a ridiculous comment to make , as if Golovkin didn't get outboxed by Canelo. He absolutely did get outboxed by Canelo. They both outboxed each other in two fights that were highly competitive.
You make it sound like Canelo had no success at all. Plenty of people believe the right decision went to Canelo in the rematch.

 

Cawford
Usyk
Loma

 

1. Lomachenko would be my number one based on his performances against all fighters not named salido and moved up through the weights and still kept on beating people with skill whilst at a slight size disadvantage
2. Oleksandr Usyk would be my number 2 due to his performances against the best opponents he can fight at cruiserweight such as breidis, dorticos and others and has been outperforming people in there own backyards which adds to his performance as he has been fighting against the odds in terms of judging not tending to be on his side.
3. Inoue would be my number 3 as he has been outperforming every opponent he has fought wise rising through the lower weights. He’s not quite fought the very best opponents bear his weights but has beaten every opponent to date with ease so that’s why he’s 3rd in my list

 

SPENCE!? That's absolutely wild. I rate him but he's beaten Brook (which was competitive) and...!? I know it isn't purely resume but it's hard to judge skills otherwise.

Anyway, Crawford/Loma/Usyk/Inoue for me. You can have the GGG argument as I thought he beat Canelo both times but his game is based off of strength too and I think the dudes listed are more dynamic.

 

He was getting edged out by Brook up until the eye injury in the 7th. Nobody can deny that either. Not even on top 10 most skilled for me although I can see why he would be placed in that top 10.

And I'm sorry, but you are telling me that an DOUBLE Olympic Gold Medallist with an amateur record which is almost perfect over 300+ fights is less skilled than some slow, same stance power puncher who's only beat a mirror image (Peterson) and a guy with one eye (Brook)? You've got to be kidding me.

Loma IS number 1 on the skill list, that can't even be debated. What planet are you living on..Just cause Spence apparently busted up old man Floyd in the gym doesn't mean he's number one on the p4p list.

 

In no order

Loma
Crawford
Garcia

Next group
Usyk Canelo Spence