Pacquiao-Cotto or Garcia-Spence: What's The Better Win (???)

again, i dont think you understand how what youre saying is relative to whats being discussed.

 

His crap resume sure doesn't tell it.

 

Pacquiaos victory over Cotto is more impressive than a possible Garcia victory over Spence. Due to Pacquiao coming up from 112 as champion.

 

Should we show them threads from 2008 when people were getting banned for saying Pac will KO cotto, hatton and DLH. I swear to God. Hatton almost died. He went flat on his back and almost died trying to get oxygen.

 

I dont know if he hates Pacquiao. But I think hes really off on this topic.

 

you girls need a room?

 

Spot on theres a clear difference in proven talent (cotto) and potential talent (spence) i do like spence as a fighter (cant stand the man tho) but completely unproven so far.

 

Cotto's a HOF'er.

Spence, well, Spence beat Kell Brook.

Advantage: Pacquiao

But I'm the type that lives by resume, not eye test, so if someone wanted to say different I wouldn't take huge issue with it, I don't think. We'd have to let 9 years go by after Mikey/Spence to compare it that way.

 

It all depends on what kind of fight it is. Is it a robbery? Is it a squeaker that could have gone either way or a blow out? Does Spence hobble into the ring injured and lethargic, or does he give a career best performance? What does Spence go on to do afterwards?

 

You're right that's the nature of the sport. But Garcia would have to win convincingly and Spence would need to do many good things after for it to compare.

A Lineal Flyweight champ knocking out a hall of fame Jr. Welterweight (Cotto started at 140) is unreal.