The difference between Wilders 50 Mill and Joshuas 15 mill offers.

One held about as much weight as me offering $50 million

 

Bottom line is wilder & his team want no part of AJ.

 

So are we to assume everything Hearn Senior said in that lakeside fishing video recently when he said they had a two-year plan for Wilder at a minimum was a sign of early onset dementia then?

You know the one, where he literally spelt out that they had no intention of fighting Wilder anytime soon as they were/are still building brand AJ.

 

I thought Barry Hearn made a point of saying that this was how he would do it in order to maximise revenue, but that he's not in charge and that Joshua had other ideas?

 

Ortiz has called Whyte's bluff twice. Wilder has called Joshua's bluff. We know how Matchroom fighters roll.

 

Yes, I'm definitely getting the feeling that Joshua is ignoring the advice of someone who made a fortune through promotion and his heir apparent (Eddie). Eschewing making millions through continued hyped low-risk high reward bouts and product endorsements which he risks losing if he gets dropped hard one time too many.

I have no doubt whatsoever that AJ's contract allows him complete flexibility over what he chooses to do and when, and gives him free reign to completely disregard long-term strategy set cos' he just bloody well likes fighting so much, just as his fame is reaching its nadir.

Errr, hang on.

 

Friendly reminder that your profile states this;

"Go on give DAZN a whirl, you might like it".

I know full well what he said, I was paying eagle-like attention to it. It was remarkable as it was a very candid admission that Team AJ have no plans whatsoever to fight Wilder anytime soon. This flies directly in the face of the $50 million gate claims. Wilder then signed to fight Fury without any issues whatsoever. Occam's razor would suggest that someone ducked, and that person happens to be from London, not Alabama.

 

That's a different question. My point was that when you said:

that he actually didn't say that. At least as I recall the interview?

 

Strawman argument. I could post the timestamped clip of Hearn Sr. laying this out and you'd still deny it or claim his syntax suggested otherwise.

 

This.
Finkel wont respond to them in any form and that's the signs of somebody who doesn't want the fight.
AJ would fight him now Wilder wants no part of AJ,good chance Fury will beat him then he be F**ked @ the table.

 

It would be a strawman argument if I were trying to refute something which you didn't claim. This is not the case here. I'm saying that this claim made by you:

is false.

Of course if you can provide a timestamped clip of Hearn saying this you will have proven me wrong. I won't be able to hide behind syntax if he literally spells it out as you've claimed.