Pulev being a contender shows once again how terrible the division is

Yeah , he had to dethrone a washed up Chris Byrd who couldn't beat a 40 year old shot Golota two years prior to make it his era .. haha!

41 Wlad>>> 37 battle worn non-heavy Chris Byrd. Now be gone rodent, i don't want to catch a disease.

 

It was an open landscape then. There was no consensus #1. Golota also wasn't 40 when he fought Byrd you utter moron.

 

thank god the soviet union countries were allowed to turn pro in the late 90s, cause guys like Tony Thompson, Chris Arreola and Eddie Chambers would have definitely have been world champions, it would have looked similar to Mike Tysons bum era in the 90s
and David Haye would have gone down as an all time great heavyweight

 

Prime Klitschkos would rule this era even easier then the last one. Wlad could get caught and KOed once or twice but Vitaly would stomp anybody easily, even AJ or Wilder. Lewis would dominate this era as well.

 

36 and 40 are the same age according the plague rat. Then again this is the same guy who thinks a 41 year old Wlad coming off a loss, a year + of inactivity and with over 20 years as a pro is "prime". Incredible how stupid this guy is.

 

Beacuse Wlad wasn't good enughj to control the first 10 year era he existed in. We know that because he lost by stoppage 3 times to b & c level conenders. The division had to descend into total tripe where the remains of Byrd was Rted #1 before WK was good enough to become dominant.
When the svene became gfood again we saw Wlad lose again .. haha! .. clown. pkease go away.

 

I never said WK against AJ was prime. Go and congregate wit your low-life scum friends downstairs..rat.

 

AJ will wait until Pulev ages even more. Pulev's prime as come and gone.

 

lol.. Pulec has walked away from AJ twice.. he had no problem facing WK though.. that means we know he who fears more..lol!

 

Sure you didn't. Hows the bottle by the way?

Someone is drunk off their rocker and needs to go to bed.

 

Pulev maybe a contender again but how highly does anyone rank him after that performance. It was more about Hughie failing to live up to peoples expectations rather than Pulev impressing.

Pulev is probably still top 10 material but I'd have him in the lower half of the top 10.

 

Wlad obliterated Pulev in his prime when he was #1 ranked. That win means something.

Pulev is a spent force now, older. AJ won't get much credit here.

 

I didn't know there were rules about coming up short and going back to the drawing board and coming back stronger. Wlad was supposed to be finished after 2004 according to people like you. Sure the division got "better" and it has nothing at all do to with his being 41 years old with over 20 years as a professional? If you never said Wlad wasn't prime in that fight why are you saying this now? Kind of contradicting yourself a bit eh? If Wlad wasn't prime then certainly a fresher version would be favored against that AJ based on how he performed?

 

He picked Pulev to beat Klitschko FYI. This guy is an embarrassment.