Not exactly true is it when money and payment has to be taken into consideration. A mandatory would require more payment. If Golovkin was forced to face Derevyanchenko as a mandatory in a fight that was scheduled and he dropped the belt I'd agree that it was a duck, under these circumstances it wasn't a duck but you hate GGG, therefore you are on this thread like a parasite.
Trout beating an out of sorts Cotto, then losing every time he stepped up bar both Charlo's in fights he arguably won. Tell me Trouts top 3 wins bar Cotto?
Arguably won by people who hate Charlo. With that said he's better than anyone Murata fought or beat. Who has Murata beat that comes within 20000 light years of Cotto?
The IBF warned GGG not to fight Vanes but he did it anyway knowing he would be stripped. They gave him a timeframe in which he could make the mandatory defense but he insisted fighting on the Canelo date despite the venue and PPV being lost. He didn't want to push the date back and use the timeframe the IBF gave to him because he didn't want to fight Dervo. Its as simple as that.
Guys better than what Charlo has and Trout bar Cotto. You do realise you are doing the exact same thing regarding Charlo that you claim you hate on GGG because of his fans doing this.....
He gave up his belt to fight a guy one division lower who was inactive and coming off a loss. 100% fact. He's also running from big Charlo ..
The only thing good about you was your Johnny Tapia avatar... Other than that you really don't know what the **** you're talking about... Like I said, just a nationlistic fanboy
You claimed he dropped the IBF or allowed the IBF to strip him to avoid Derevyanchenko when you know it's more complex......so would you want to fight Canelo or Derevyanchenko?
GGG has reached the level he can pick who he wants aas long as there top 10 who care. charlo has done nothing at 160 except beat a one legged man
Would this be after my initial opponent failed a test and then the fight was rescheduled?.....or a mandatory/optional defence?