Abel Sanchez says NO to fights vs Andrade/Charlo/Callum Smith but YES to Rob Brant !

The funny part about your response is you are actually trying to assign rationale to the decision. The decision, barring a KO, was pre-determined, so who gives a hoot which rounds they did or didn't give either fighter. In the end, Canelo was given the decision. That is all that matters. These judges follow orders. They don't judge fights.

 

Your nose is stuck in Canelo's panties. Canelo didn't do $hit in either fight. He was the one fighting in spots and fighting to survive. He certainly didn't take it from the undefeated champ. You are in denial. Follow the money, you little puppy.

 

You're extremely delusional if you really think the decision was predetermined. I know a lot of GGG fans say that a lot so they can discredit Canelo's win. It's because GGG fans can't stomach the fact that Canelo beat GGG "Mexican Style" which was what GGG was begging for. You can't deny that GGG was forced to retreat and fight in a differnet way than we've ever seen GGG fight when Canelo continued to come at GGG with a relentless assault of power shots. You can't even use the excuse that Canelo didn't take the fight to the champ in the rematch which you supposedly need to do to beat the champ. GGG fans are always moving the goal posts in any way possible to discredit what Canelo accomplished and it's really a sign of insecurity. If it isn't that the judges were paid off, it was that GGG was too old, if it wasn't that GGG was too old it was that Canelo didn't come forward enough, when Canelo comes forward the entire fight it's that the judges were paid off it just keep going in a circle of excuses. It sounds to me like you got a really big GGG bromance going who can't accept what happened.

 

No **** sherlock....

 

I'll rely on what I saw and what most of Press Row saw as well, noob. Go sell your $hit somewhere else.

 

no **** but yet how many posters are complaining about it, acting like he's taking an easy fight? Now I'm not saying that there aren't tougher fighters than Fielding at 160, but still moving up in weight 3 months after going toe to toe with GGG when you were a 154-lber not too long ago is a big challenge. The other thing to consider is what options did he really have at 160 for a December fight? Jacobs just fought, he wouldn't be ready to fight next month after just going 12 rounds. GGG has stated he is taking the rest of the year off. So it's not like fighters were just lining up to fight Canelo at 160 in December. That's a quick turnaround and he needed to find someone that was available and wanted to fight.

 

lol "noob" ? Really ? I've been a member here longer than you have. I have more than double the amount of posts as you and way more likes. Buddy you sound like a noob and frankly a GGG fanboy if you really believe that the scorecards were predetermined. Canelo won those fights, he beat GGG in both fights. GGG was gifted a draw in the first fight but not in the 2nd as Canelo clearly landed more power punches and more body shots. All GGG could do was jab and retreat. Canelo did what GGG asked for and what most fight fans wanted which was for him to come forward and stay in the pocket. Stop making excuses for GGG, Canelo beat him fair and square.

 

@shadow111

Guy, give it up. Drugnelo benefited from 2 robberies.

 

You're in a GGG love affair if you think either fight was a robbery.

 

They were both robberies.

 

Canelo walked through GGG in the rematch. He provided relentless aggression and forced GGG to back up and mostly only land light jabs or glancing shots in most of the rounds while he landed a relentless assault of power punches many that landed with force. In round 10 GGG did land a big shot and it won him that round, but he was already behind on the cards.

In most of the rounds (2,3,5,6,7,8,9,11,12) Canelo was the one coming forward and landing bombs. The only rounds that GGG won convincingly were rounds 1, 4, 10. GGG arguably won 8, 9, 11 and 12, though each of these rounds are pretty much toss-ups and giving GGG all of those rounds would be giving GGG all the close rounds. Canelo clearly won rounds 2,3,5, and 6. 7 was closer, 8 and 9 were pretty much toss-ups. 11 is a hard round to score and so was 12 so you really gotta split those rounds. In the rematch, Canelo won more rounds clearly than GGG did. If you split the toss-up rounds in the rematch evenly, you end up with Canelo winning. If you give GGG more of the toss up rounds, you end up with a draw. If you give GGG all the close up rounds you can find a way to have GGG winning. But that's a huge stretch. Only favorable GGG judging gets him the win in the rematch. Canelo did what he needed to do to win the rematch and become Unified Champion. He earned the win and it's sour grapes if you as a GGG fan can't give him the credit he earned. But I'm happy to break this down for you and lay it all out there as to why he won and how you can't possibly argue a robbery. There's a long list of press row and fighter comments after the rematch in which they stated emphatically that the rematch was not a robbery. Many of these people had GGG winning but recognized what Canelo did and that he did enough to get the win. So you don't really have an leg to stand on in saying the rematch was a robbery when so many have come out and said that it wasn't.

 

STFU...your over-analyzing is boring and pointless....

 

Andrade and Charlo don't make sense because they would be Golovkins' second or third best career victory.

 

So he should fight somebody that would be his 4th or 5th best career victory

 

According to him, it seems that is the case.