Abel Sanchez says NO to fights vs Andrade/Charlo/Callum Smith but YES to Rob Brant !

If you honestly believe having more posts or likes means you have been watching boxing longer, or that somehow that means you know more, then you are more clueless than most of us realized.

You're a noob because you have a low grasp of boxing.

 

You're under-analyzing it. You're adverse to my breaking it down because it exposes your calling it a robbery.

 

Not at all. It's quite the opposite. Your 'breakdown' is done in a manner that suits you. How freeaking obtuse are you man? Yeah, sell your own BS and buy in to it....that's what you do.

 

Let's just call this what it is: GGG wants a trinket to have to negotiate a third huge payday vs. Canelo.

Charlo and Jacobs are more likely to get in the way of that.

Sad that boxing has become so transparent.

 

Look at you come to the defense of that poster. OH how you're trying to twist this lol. Where did I say that being here longer and having more posts and likes means that I've been watching boxing longer, or that somehow that means I know more about boxing?

What it means if I've been here that long is that I'm not a "noob" lol. Not only that but my ability to go into detail on stuff that nobody else does shows that I'm the complete opposite of a noob.

I've been here for 3x as many years as you have. I'm your BN24 elder. Imagine calling someone a noob who's been at a place longer than you have and done more than you.

 

At least I'm doing something and actually explaining myself and why I believe what I believe, rather then just saying something outlandish and not justifying it.

 

Jacobs and Andrande apparently don't make sense and they both have belts. Charlo was ruled a final eliminator by the WBC but that fight doesn't make sense either.

Smith is a big money fight on Sky PPV that Hearn has dangled in front of him but doesn't make any sense because Golovkin supposedly walks around at 170.. 170?? lol!!

 

Good for you!!

 

It could be worse, Golovkin could be fighting ROCKY FIELDING.

 

Idiot...I was posting here 15 years ago. Back when you were still in diapers....

 

Does anybody on the board know Smith's usual fighting weight? Does he balloon up after the weigh in? I'm just curious as to how much weight GGG is likely to give up in the ring. If it's 10 pounds+, I don't blame him for staying at 160.

Really, the thing to do is fight Charlo or Jacobs, but he's trying to bide time until Canelo 3.

 

lol first of all it wasn't directed at you it was directed at the first person who called me a "noob". second of all and i hate to break this to ya but i wasn't in diapers 15 years ago. now i'm not calling you a liar that you were posting here 15 years ago under a different name but anyone can say that. in calling somebody a "noob", we can only go by how long you've had your current account. you wanna talk about something idiotic : calling somebody a "noob" on a boxing forum who has more posts more likes and has been here longer than you is idiotic. (and by "you" I'm not refering to "you" specifically just anyone who would say that)

 

If someone said they were hungry enough to eat a horse, you would probably expect them to eat a horse.

And you still think having more posts than someone means you aren't a noob? How old are you FFS? You honestly don't see the fallacy in that line of thinking?

"I have more posts then he does, therefore I have been watching boxing longer!" - That's your idiotic statement.

Your boyfriend Isal knows I've been here since 2003. Tinder his butt and ask him...

 

lol I said I'm not questioning whether you were here since 2003 under another name lol. I'm talking about the guy who called me a noob who hasn't been here as long as me.

Do you even understand the meaning of the word noob. "definition : a person who is inexperienced in a particular sphere or activity, especially computing or the use of the Internet."

hrmmmmmm anotherwords who's more experienced here talking boxing. who's less of a beginner is less of a noob. the more posts you have, the longer you've been somewhere the more you've participated, the less you need to rely on gimmicks, and the less of a noob you are.

 

What a crock of garbage. But this really explains everything about you Mr. dunning kruger...

Only a friggin idiot thinks post counts determines what makes one a noob to a sport or not. You've exposed your gross ignorance and naivete 10 fold noob...