So Wilder will be the lineal champion when he wins in a few weeks?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mthez, Nov 13, 2018.


  1. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,469
    81,962
    Aug 21, 2012
    Wilder might even be able to hang with Briggs if he becomes lineal.
     
    madballster likes this.
  2. mthez

    mthez Active Member banned Full Member

    578
    350
    Aug 12, 2016

    So therefore with a 100% doubt Wilder will be lineal champion if he beats Fury.

    Are Fury fans going to proclaim Firy the lineal champ too?
     
  3. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    The whole idea of a 'lineal' champ is a very bad joke. It's an imaginary title that fanboys bring out when it suits them in order to try and bestow some kind of kudos on their fighter. The actual meaning is also routinely twisted in order to suit the agenda of the person making the argument. For a prime example witness the whole fiasco with Canelo fanboys trying to claim him as 'lineal' middleweight champ after the Cotto fight. And this is not an exaggeration, the below comments were all made on this board.

    Err.... guys, he's never actually fought a middleweight bout so how can he possibly have any legitimate claim to middleweight championship status.

    "Doesn't matter because the imaginary title can be won at any weight, it doesn't actually need to be at the championship weight".

    Canelo moves down in weight to fight for the title at 154

    "Doesn't matter because you are imaginary champion unless you move UP in weight"

    Canelo moves up to fight Chavez at 164

    "Doesn't matter because the imaginary title can't be vacated unless you move up in weight because you can't make it anymore"

    Canelo says he's not a middleweight champ anymore

    "Doesn't matter because he's got no say in it and doesn't have the right to decide whether he has a claim to championship status so ner ner nah booo".

    After all that, it gets very hard to take the whole thing at all seriously!!!
     
    boxfan99, BCS8 and Robney like this.
  4. minemax

    minemax Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,993
    4,783
    Nov 10, 2017
    If in some cases a lineal championship is complicated and controversial it doesn't mean that the whole idea is a joke. Far from it. Especially now, when we have four major boxing associations and some of them have several championship titles in one weight category.
     
    Gatekeeper likes this.
  5. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    OK maybe has become a very bad joke would be more appropriate.
     
  6. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Plus he ducked Wlad twice even though he signed the rematch contract. He lost any claim to any sort of fantasy title right there.
     
    Heavy_Hitter, BCS8 and Infern0121 like this.
  7. this_is_scotty

    this_is_scotty New Member Full Member

    14
    25
    Nov 4, 2018
    So am I right in thinking that on the basis that Wlad never beat him. If Lennox Lewis came out retirement tomorrow ... he'd become lineal heavyweight champion?
     
    Sandman_ likes this.
  8. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Both very valid points and further show how ridiculous the whole thing has become. According to fanboys when it suits their arguments, you can basically spend as long doing naff all as you feel like, duck the hell out of anyone who is any danger and still nobody else has any right to call themselves champ.

    I think the usual argument people make is that where a fighter has formally and officially announced their retirement (i.e. Lewis), this usually counts as disclaiming championship status and the lineage is broken. But even that can be argued given that there are no official rules for this imaginary title. Hence why people make them up as they go along to suit their own agenda.
     
    madballster likes this.
  9. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    The "lineal champion" has become something that people use it whenever it fits their agenda. When Wilder wins (which most here expect, including myself) Wilder and his fans will claim he's the "real champ". When Fury beat Wlad, Wilder has zero interest in fighting him. You know, when Fury was actually the champ.
     
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    27,099
    18,138
    Apr 3, 2012
    So, let me get this straight: Being the lineal heavyweight champion doesn't count if you win it via shattering English glass?
     
  11. this_is_scotty

    this_is_scotty New Member Full Member

    14
    25
    Nov 4, 2018
    A deluded American with what appears to be low level down syndrome fights a formerly suicidal, mentally unstable gypsy for an imaginary title that Lennox Lewis may or may not still have a right too ....

    Did Vince McMahon book this?
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    27,099
    18,138
    Apr 3, 2012
    You know, when Fury wasn't actually fighting.
     
  13. Heavy_Hitter

    Heavy_Hitter Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,320
    5,078
    Jul 7, 2018
    Fury needs to win this to prove he's the real deal, at this point his biggest victory is shot Wlad. Who cares about liberal belt
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2018
  14. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Wilder is not going to win, so no.
     
  15. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Ahhhh I never really honed in on this before but an argument could be made supporting the liberal nature of a “lineal belt”.

    The underlying definition of the belt is what gives it that generational passing of the torch appeal. You’re calling it a “liberal belt” because it has liberal implications...it’s supposed to represent progressive change and fighter evolution. Well done with the word play sir.