Hatton vs Mancini

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,325
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    Prime Mancini moves up to 140. Does he have a chance or is Ricky too big?
     
    Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018
    Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018
    #1
  2. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,095
    15,563
    Dec 20, 2006
    Well I read last week that Mancini was among the most overrated on this forum so I clearly can not pick him.

    I read this week that Hatton is among the most overrated on this forum so I can clearly not pick him.

    If I pick a draw I will clearly be overrating one or both of them so I can clearly not pick that.

    This is quite the conundrum.
     
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 26, 2018
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 26, 2018
    #2
    SHADAPBLAD, Jel, Tin_Ribs and 1 other person like this.
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,095
    15,563
    Dec 20, 2006
    Seriously both styles will blend perfectly. Neither guy is going to want to concede an inch. Neither guy is a defensive wizard although I think Mancini has better head movement. I just think Hatton is the naturally larger and stronger guy and his punches will have the greater toll.

    Mancini was more of a lightweight, and didn’t really come up till Camacho (by the way I think Mancini won that fight.), I don’t think he is going to be able to handle Hattons power. Close for 4-5 rounds, rickey takes control in 6-8 and stops boom boom in the 9th or 10th
     
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 26, 2018
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 26, 2018
    #3
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,325
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    Agreed 100% with your assessment.
     
    Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018
    Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018
    #4
  5. Farooq

    Farooq Member banned Full Member

    231
    96
    Nov 13, 2018
    Rocky Marciano, Jack Dempsey are the most overrated guys on this forum.
     
    Farooq, Nov 26, 2018
    Farooq, Nov 26, 2018
    #5
  6. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,095
    15,563
    Dec 20, 2006
    This content is protected
     
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 26, 2018
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 26, 2018
    #6
    robert ungurean likes this.
  7. Farooq

    Farooq Member banned Full Member

    231
    96
    Nov 13, 2018
    Should I be insulted? If that is the best you can come up with kid I feel sorry for you. My point stands Rocky Marciano and Jack Dempsey are the 2 most overrated guys on this forum. Ray Mancini isn't even close because most people know he wasn't that good.
     
    Farooq, Nov 26, 2018
    Farooq, Nov 26, 2018
    #7
  8. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,325
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    It's debatable who the most overrated guy on Classic is.

    The most overrated guy on the general forum is by faarrrrrr Loma.
     
    Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018
    Xplosive, Nov 26, 2018
    #8
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,524
    17,573
    Apr 3, 2012
    Hatton would rough Mancini up. Hatton only lost to the best.
     
    NoNeck, Nov 26, 2018
    NoNeck, Nov 26, 2018
    #9
  10. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,829
    13,119
    Oct 20, 2017
    I predict a chess match between these two defensive geniuses...

    Or a barnstorming brawl that Hatton edges only because he is the naturally bigger man.
     
    Jel, Nov 27, 2018
    Jel, Nov 27, 2018
    #10
    red cobra and Jackstraw like this.
  11. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,425
    12,850
    Feb 2, 2006
    Mancini all the way .
    hatton lost only to the best- he got CRUSHED by the best .
    Arguello had hell with Mancini and Arguello would have stopped Hatton inside 7 .
    hatton beat a KT who hadnt fought in 2 years almost- who else did he beat at jr welter?
    Mancini is very underrated. I too thought he beat Camacho.
     
    Cobra33, Nov 27, 2018
    Cobra33, Nov 27, 2018
    #11
  12. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,325
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    Valid points, but I think Hatton being the stronger of the two would be a problem for Ray. Not only the stronger of the two, Hatton was also quicker/more athletic than Mancini with better footwork.

    I do agree that Arguello would KO Hatton. As open as Ricky was, once Alexis found the range on that right hand, it would get ugly for Hatton.
     
    Xplosive, Nov 27, 2018
    Xplosive, Nov 27, 2018
    #12
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,524
    17,573
    Apr 3, 2012
    Zoo was better at 140 than Arguello, and Hatton didn't lose to him. Hatton would enter the ring at 155 and mow Mancini down; Mancini was a 5'4 lightweight. Pretty easy pick.
     
    NoNeck, Nov 27, 2018
    NoNeck, Nov 27, 2018
    #13
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,553
    Jul 28, 2004
    As a poster, you are.
     
    red cobra, Nov 28, 2018
    red cobra, Nov 28, 2018
    #14
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  15. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,095
    15,563
    Dec 20, 2006
    First he is booted (yay) 2nd he was never rated highly to begin with. He had a very short and lackluster peak indeed
     
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 28, 2018
    PhillyPhan69, Nov 28, 2018
    #15
    red cobra likes this.
Page 1 of 2