Once again a totally fixed card and once again an English judge too afraid to score what he sees for fear of being called biased. Phil Edwards you absolute tit
Great poster jonny but disagree. With the 10-8 rounds he only needs three more i think there was four very close rounds that could of gone either way with Tyson winning the other six clearly!
Sounds like he may have lost a substantial sum - he is seething with rage!!! Maybe he is Big Joan Fury in disguise on here
I listened and never watched the fight. But I find it hard to believe there were that many rounds that were so close because everyone I’ve read on rbr on the general and on social media had Fury winning almost them all. These aren’t even British people.
It was like many of the early rounds in Bellew v Usyk - not a lot happening with Wilder on the front foot. Fury's celebrations at the end of such rounds clearly influence some judges. Many a referee would have stopped the fight quickly in the 12th round with the heavy knockdown. I felt that the time the ref took to restart the fight was excessive both knockdowns. Surely he makes his decision by the count of ten but this ref took another 10 secs to think about it in the 12th round. Any result would not have been a robbery at the final bell.
Well done for not buying a PPV - PM me a couple of hours before the next PPV and you can turn your radio off.
Most people do watch through biased lenses even though they don't mean to - it is easy to see what you want to see and ignore as irrelevant what you don't want to see.
No bias here. That's how I scored it, and TBH the 12th round according to the usually way it should be scored should have been 9-9.
I scored that final round 10-8 to Wilder even though Fury fought back - he had to endure an onslaught for a period of that round. We all see things different
