You're all acting like casuals. Draw is correct.

You are a ****en ****** and should be banned for calling us boxing aficionados casuals.

You can start learning how to count a scorecard 1st, then we might teach you how to score.
Ffs I have been coming to this forum since you were in nappies lol.

This is not my 1st account BTW, but the only account I used since I made this one. Had a break and forgot my 1st account

 

9-3 Fury and the 12th was a marginal 10-8 round as Wilder was wilting bad at the end of it.

 

With some of the emotionally embarrassing robberies you have called previously this really is laughable. This was 9-3 Fury and not even tough to score.

 

Mate you’re an absolute embarrassment - pack up and go home you know nothing about boxing or maths

 

That’s because that’s the only 2 rounds wilder won

 

So Ward knows How Kovelav felt when they robbed him in their first fight.

 

a draw is not impossible sure, but the fight was with fury, only trouble being he is too easy to knock over, which gave wilder a lifeline.

 

Floyd’s scoring means nothing to me. I will watch again as well.

 

I had Wilder winning rounds 2, 9 and 12 but, if you give him 1 or 2 of the close rounds, then a draw is cool. You make some fair points. By the way, I wanted Wilder to straight destroy Fury.

 

LOL fury proved you wrong again you thought wilder would of beat him easy

Fury should of won that made wilder look like a clown and when wilder knocked him down hard fury came back and hurt him also

Fury won!

 

Fight wasn't close, I had Wilder only winning 3 rounds, the 2nd and then the 2 rounds he knocked down Fury. At a stretch Wilder won 4 rounds and that's being generous.

Fact is Fury schooled Wilder and it wasn't even a 100% Fury, a slightly out of shape Fury not even 6 months from returning form about 3 years out clowned Wilder for 9 rounds.

 

Yep, he did. All credit to Fury. Him getting up in the 12th without being wobbled and taking the fight to Wilder was impressive as anything I've seen in boxing in a while. He fought a damn good fight.
He seems to be in a better place now but, you're still an ass! LOL

 

I often agree with you but think you're waaaay off base with this. This was an obvious robbery in my opinion and that of a whole load of others who would of given Wilder credit if he won but in no way did he deserve the win or even a draw.

Andre Ward giving it to Fury by 3 rounds and complaining about dodgy officiating made me laugh though - Deontay must be thinking "Really Andre? You want to call out judging..."

 

I had it 7/5 in rounds to DW But that's with having to give a fighter every round no even rounds. The biggest problem is every round outside the 9th and 12th has a better argument for being 10/10 than either fighter truly and legitimately winning said round.

After reading all these crazy, insane and obviously troll based topics and posts on robbery this fury did this, he did nothing.

Fury did Not dominate a single round. He slightly could be given a few rounds based on how judges refuse to call even rounds even on the scorecards, that's why we have so many head scratches.

Wilder beat fury clearly in my eyes, granted I've seen the fight only once and going in too many of you guys had me expecting fury to actually be winning rounds not just fighting at best even rounds while losing badly to the only rounds that were actually won by either fighter

Wilder - fury
R1 10-9 Clear missed first 20 secs
R2 10-10 if have to pick is dw missed first 30 secs
R3 9-10 very tiny edge missed first 15 secs
R4 10-10, if have to pick is dw
R5 missed entire round
R6 10-9 close but clear
R7 9-10 best fury round by far
R8 10-9 clear
R9 10-8 clear
R10 9-10 close
R11 9-10 close
R12 10-8
Clearly 7 of the 12 rounds were literally too close for me to understand how non were scored even.

Fury got extra credit for throwing and landing more jabs while most of the clean power shots to head and body were clearly being thrown more and landing more by Wilder.

It's true too many fans on here judge fights with their hearts and not the actual true action in the ring and it's baffling to me but once I take in to account the level of sports fans around the world it makes sense. Pathetic but it is what it is

Fury couldn't ever fight at a higher level VS Wilder where Wilder couldn't ever fight at a lower level against fury and I still saw wilder as the superior fighter, not strictly technical boxer but he's a way better fighter and couldn't ever lose to fury, especially now knowing for a fact that if he fought to jusr win and not win by sensational ko he beats fury easy 99/100x and that 1 out of the 100 he was already handed a draw.