For all the "Oh Wlad was shot", "Fury isn't that skillfull Wlad just didn't throw" etc etc etc

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by LD Boxer-Puncher, Dec 1, 2018.


  1. PunchersChance.

    PunchersChance. Active Member banned Full Member

    1,050
    1,020
    Nov 30, 2018
    Fury would beat any version of Wlad imho, just a much more complete boxer and more natural fighter. One of the most skilled big men I’ve ever seen in the ring.
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  2. Tyson Fury Goat

    Tyson Fury Goat Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,876
    3,292
    Apr 21, 2017
    Wlad fougth a much much much better fury
     
  3. Luis Fernando

    Luis Fernando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,120
    1,275
    Aug 23, 2017
    Isn't it funny how the same people who trash talked Wladimir Klitschko on how horrible a boxer he's been, how stiff / robotic he's been, how he's fought in such a weak division, how he's only managed success against smaller opponents, how boring he's been and so forth so on. These are the same people who are now using Fury's (and Joshua's too) win over Wladimir Klitschko as evidence of Tyson Fury's 'greatness' and 'excellence'.

    Well, sorry to break it for you folks. But history hasn't still erased the FACT that PRIME, that's right, PRIME Wladimir Klitschko was blasted out of the ring in merely 2 rounds by Corrie Sanders.

    Meanwhile, this supposed 'great' and 'excellent' Tyson Fury needed a decision to win in a fight where he was barely even able to land punches on the worst version of Wladimir Klitschko at age 39. By virtue of being 39, Wladimir Klitschko was past prime, based on science proving athletes have their reflexes declined by that age. Along with their ability to recover from damage, stamina, legs and etc.

    It's embarrassing how INSANELY slow Tyson Fury looked against grandpa Wladimir Klitschko. Almost looked like he was moving in slow motion, such is the case of how much PRIME Fury's speed was lacking. Evident by the fact that Fury couldn't even land double digit number of CLEAN punches on any round against grandpa old Wladimir Klitschko. Which is a testament to how slow and inaccurate Fury is.

    The same is the case with Anthony Joshua, who also looked horrible against ancient grandpa Wladimir Klitschko!

    So if Joshua and Fury beating an ancient Wladimir Klitschko is supposed to prove how 'great' or 'brilliant' they are. Then what does that make Corrie Sanders then? SUPER DUPER GREAT? LOL!

    People here acting like Fury being superior to Wladimir Klitschko head to head is supposed to mean something or anything IMPRESSIVE? When Corrie Sanders had already proven superior against PRIME Wladimir Klitshcko head to head than Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury did combined against an INSANELY SHOT, ANCIENT GRANDPA Wladimir Klitschko?

    All of this proves how much of a joke Tyson Fury, and the entire heavyweight division is today! That the best heavyweights today, are based on either beating:

    1) A 40+ year old patient with high blood pressure with no notable global accomplishments in either amateur or pro boxing.

    OR

    2) Corrie Sander's leftover in Wladimir Klitschko who according to those same people, was never really any good to begin with, even in his prime. Was always stiff, robotic, boring, fought in an INSANELY weak era and only beat smaller boxers. So it's only logical Fury and Joshua deserve even less credit for beating old, grandpa and ancient Wladimir Klitshcko.


    So what exactly is supposed to be so special about clowns like Fury and Wilder? Or hype-jobs like Joshua?
     
  4. Heavy_Hitter

    Heavy_Hitter Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,320
    5,078
    Jul 7, 2018
    Not really, Fury holds a victory over old Wlad, basic but strong Wilder and Chisora. It's not enough to claim that Fury is better H2H
     
  5. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,779
    1,178
    May 10, 2017
    All. I've done is my part in trying to point out the reality of the situation to people blinded by hatred. No crying here
     
  6. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,008
    10,034
    Oct 1, 2011
    My bad! I do the same thing! People hate on good fighters because their love for another fighter. The damn hypocracy is what kills me the most!
     
  7. rapscalion

    rapscalion Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,849
    761
    Oct 7, 2010
    If Wlad was shot when he fought Fury what's that say about when he fought Joshua and that's his best win
     
    Southpawswitch likes this.
  8. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,779
    1,178
    May 10, 2017
    Utter nonsense, the whole other side to the rhetoric was that Fury was not very good and was simply being hyped up on one lucky night he had with a "shot" Wlad. You know it was, as I do.

    It therefore has everything to do with it. As in his second fight against top level opposition he went and clowned them in almost the exact same fashion again. Wilder isn't shot too now is he?
     
  9. iii

    iii Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,832
    4,093
    May 3, 2016
    All these embittered new posters...anyone seen iSAL lately ...
     
  10. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,008
    10,034
    Oct 1, 2011
    Since you're being honest and what not. What if Wilder had beaten Vlad that night instead of Wilder? You telling me people would have given DW full credit. Before you answer that, answer this..... how much credit do you give DW for stopping Ortiz? I know there are some that give DW 0 credit for that win. Are you in that group?
     
  11. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    I disagree. When Fury boxed Wlad, people had to take notice. In my opinion, he looked even better last night than he did against Wlad. Fury was more Octopus arms and flailing against Wlad. Last night Fury pumped a solid, lightning fast jab, and even sat down on some shots, buzzing Wilder a few times. I was impressed. I favor Fury in the rematch, and expect him to be even sharper, with even less back flab and turkey arm than last night.
     
  12. j0hn0

    j0hn0 double up on the jab Full Member

    773
    192
    Feb 16, 2006
    this is the most thorough quoted response ive ever seen :p. No i dont think wlad was fully himself against AJ. i think thats how great Wlad actually is/was...that even a shell of himself put that performance forward. he was so good for so long that no one even challenged him. there were fighters along the way that wlad beat that would definitely have had at least a 50/50 shot against wilder, fury, aj. probably some that would be heavily favored in fact.
     
  13. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,779
    1,178
    May 10, 2017
    I'd have certainly credited Wilder. As I do Fury.
    I'm not in that group at all and I do not understand their viewpoint. I will admit I didn't see him as a serious champ until that fight, and it took him too long to get to it, but yeah full credit for the Ortiz win, a very good solid guy on his record
     
    Braindamage likes this.
  14. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,779
    1,178
    May 10, 2017
    I think there's truth to that of course, he showed more in the Wilder fight but the Wlad fight was much more about only doing what he had to do.
    He couldn't afford to be just as patient against Wilder because he always had that big right hand threat against him if he allowed Wilder to believe he was letting up and allowing him onto him.

    I don't think that makes it a better performance, just a different one.
     
  15. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,779
    1,178
    May 10, 2017
    Interesting, which ones is it you think would have a 50/50 shot or even favourite tag against Fury or AJ?