You need to get a grip you silly little boy, salty tears? I ain't no Wilder fanboy, Fury won the fight IMO.
Your opinion means little when you've outed yourself as a joke with this thread. Wilder hit's hard but all the BS and the spin job your trying to work here to find one tiny piece of a positive in what was a damning night for Wilder is as weak as your insults.
The joke is on you when you try and claim that Wilder wouldn't be able to drop or knockout pensioner Holmes with his right hand. Believe you me if that right hand landed on any version of Holmes there is only one outcome, Larry falling like a tree.
Even if Holmes went down, which is possible, Wilder does hit hard, Wilder couldn't finish him like Tyson could. Tyson was a far more efficient finisher. Wilder in comparison windmills, missing wildly most of the time which leaves him open to be countered. No way Wilder can keep Holmes down, Shavers couldn't and countless other punchers couldn't even drop him when he was in his 40's. Wilder couldn't carry Larry Holmes jockstrap, hell Wilder couldn't carry the jock strap of the the guy carrying Holmes' jockstrap.
Wilder cracks considerably harder than Tyson. Chances are pensioner Holmes doesn't get up after the first knockdown. That's the difference between Tyson and Wider........
Maybe he is the hardest puncher ever, there is definitely an argument to be made for that. He is a freak of nature for sure though, for a 210 lbs man to pack so much power is unnatural. While Fury isnt known to have a granite chin, every solid punch that Wilder landed either hurt him or had him on the deck
No, the difference between them is that Tyson had an array of skills to complement his excellent punching power.
Again what has that got to do with the point of the thread? This is not a question of who is the better finisher or who is the more skilled.