Would a prime Mike Tyson lose to any of the current top heavyweights?

I think Fury got his name from Mike anyway.

 

Count how many times Smith clinched v Mike and Tucker clinched a lot too, having said that Tucker scored far more punches than Smith did in their respective spoiling efforts against Mike.

 

Guess where I pasted my question from? I just felt it was timely and I feel Mike and Fury would have been a great fight.

 

Best fighter in the clinch was Mayweather, it`s not easy.

 

Tucker would have given AJ and Wilder real problems and he would have beaten Povetkin, while taking his shots easily, he had a far better chin than AJ has.

 

Fury slips shots far better than Tillis did and knows how to judge distance and use his 85 inch reach brilliantly.

 

Douglas also got caught because he was overcommitting with the jab, Fury has a small stance, that square`s up often so that he can throw punches fast and get away quickly, you have quicker mobility from a smaller stance, Wilder`s stance is far too wide.

 

I was a skinny kid when Van Damme played a fraud called Frank Dux in bloodsport, but Tyson`s biceps are bigger than Van Damme`s and he punched harder than Arnie, all I was saying is fans need to be specific when explaining that today`s heavies are bigger and stronger, Tyson has bigger biceps than Wilder who isn`t a big heavy because he weighed less against Fury than Mike used to weigh, so why is Wilder bigger and stronger than Mike, it doesn`t make sense, he`s just taller, why would that make him stronger than the shorter Tyson? AJ is built like a tank which is why fans are saying he is on steroids, Fury has puppy fat and his arms don`t look that big, but yes he might bully Mioke in the clinch, but Wilder is really slender and his trunk is far slimmer than Mike`s who could kill him with his right hook to the body, AJ`s body is tough as a tank.