Yet less than 24 hours later, after a draw, both were talking about Anthony Joshua in every single interview. Wake up people. Wilder kept his WBC belt. Fury kept his Lineal status. Both kept their shots at Joshua. Guess it explains the lack of animated 'Robbery' claims from Warren's side, who were very calm.
The desperation and trolling is pathetic. What I find particularly hypocritical, is just how desperate these 2 are to scream best vs best, yet after Fury clearly won, niether will fight the best Joshua (Fury might), and both are painfully desperate to claim its only a 3 horse race as well so they dont have to fight anyone else either. No interest in a rematch whatsoever. Wilder was simply a warm up fight for the rusty Fury, and he still easily won despite every single advantage being against him. Fury vs Joshua and Wilder vs either Whyte or Miller next. Otherwise the best vs the best claims are what everyone already knows they are, complete BS.
Usyk became unified CW champ and then immediately mentioned Bellew. Doesn’t mean ****. And they were talking about Joshua because he was too scared to fight Wilder. Did you even hear Fury on the mic in the ring after? He was ripping the **** out of that fraud from Watford.
Bellew was WBC Emeritus, and was undefeated at CW. Usyk killed 2 birds with 1 stone. Cleared up CW, and raised his UK profile.
What point exactly are you trying to make with this thread? Both mentioned Joshua not because he’s the best, but because he’s a big money fight that both would be favoured to beat.
Not in my book. Wilder is too open and AJ would land fairly easily to force a stoppage. Not saying that Wilder couldn't do the same to Joshua, but AJ has much better fundamentals so he'd land first and more often. The fact that Wilder was able to land and floor Fury tells me that so can AJ. A much tougher fight that I would make 50/50.