Is Fury the Lineal Champion? Before the obvious answers come flying in. I understand how people say its the man who beat the man and back in 2015, Tyson Fury did exactly that and beat Wladimir Klitschko to make that claim, but then Fury was out of action for a long period and yet he has come back and being called the lineal champion. So the questions are... This content is protected How long could he be out of action to still have that title? This content is protected If he never came back, how would a new lineage begin if someone can be gone for so long and just be the lineal champ again ie if Lennox Lewis came back could he have the same claim? This content is protected If say Joshua and Wilder had of fought in that time making a new lineage then would Fury automatically take that title off them when he fought Seferi? This content is protected Was the fight with Seferi a defence of the lineal HW title? This content is protected Does he keep the claim of lineal champion as new lineage had not been determined in his absence? Im not saying he is or isnt but wanted to know what the general thought was. Please answer?
a) 2 years seems a reasonable amount of time to me. b) New lineage would be established by consensus top 2 fighting. c) No. d) No. e)No. Personally, I believe there is no lineal champion right now at Heavyweight. It will require a fight between Joshua and the Fury - Wilder II winner to establish a new champion.
He's the man who beat the man, who beat the man, so he's the lineal champion, what's so hard to understand ?!
Fury can come back and be as good as he was when he beat Klitscho, therefore we have to consider him the true lineal champion, because nobody took his belts off him by defeating him. It's the same situation Ali found himself in when he came back. He was considered the true champ even though Frazier had the belts. Frazier of course beat him and so the torch passed. If Lewis came back after so long, then no you wouldn't consider him the lineal champ. I'm sure he would say he is (If he did come back) and some fans would say so too, but on the whole, I think the boxing community would make a fair judgement that he wouldn't be the same Lewis. I mean, even the Lewis that retired with the belts was faded!
Why dont you look at the questions rather than just the title? Below Before the obvious answers come flying in. I understand how people say its the man who beat the man and back in 2015, Tyson Fury did exactly that and beat Wladimir Klitschko to make that claim, but then Fury was out of action for a long period and yet he has come back and being called the lineal champion. So the questions are... a.) How long could he be out of action to still have that title? b.) If he never came back, how would a new lineage begin if someone can be gone for so long and just be the lineal champ again ie if Lennox Lewis came back could he have the same claim? c.) If say Joshua and Wilder had of fought in that time making a new lineage then would Fury automatically take that title off them when he fought Seferi? d.) Was the fight with Seferi a defence of the lineal HW title? e.) Does he keep the claim of lineal champion as new lineage had not been determined in his absence? Im not saying he is or isnt but wanted to know what the general thought was. Please answer?
When Fury came back, many said he wasnt the same fighter and the pre fight report felt it was too soon for him. Just read what was on this forum when he fought Seferi
Yea, because he looked like absolute crap against Seferi. It looked like a different fighter vs Wilder. However, Wilder is that bad, the current Fury might still be levels below the one from 2015. We just don't know yet.
He was never technically the lineal champ. I don't have a big problem with him being called that, because he beat someone widely acknowledged as "the man" in the division, in Wlad. But technically, Lewis was the last lineal champ. Another true lineal champ doesn't get made until all recognized belts are fully unified by one person, eliminating any legit debate. Lewis had "beat the man who beat the man", in Briggs, who had beat Foreman (kinda), who had beat Moorer, in a lineage directly traceable back to when Floyd Patterson was acclaimed the consensus world champ after Marciano had retired. That was easy to do back when there was only one or 2 belts. Its gotten a lot harder over the years. So, when an ATG standout like Wlad exists, we think of him as the lineal champ and the first guy to beat him gets that title. Again, I don't have a big problem with that mental shorthand way of viewing it. But a technically "pure" lineal champ won't be made against until one of these guys collects all four recognized belts, and beats Fury (unless it is Fury), assuming he is still active.
Im really in the minority with the Seferi fight. I thought it was a fair comeback after so long off. and Fury didnt take a solid punch and beat a fighter that had gone the distance with Charr. At the time I recall asking posters How different they think Furys fight with Seferi was compared to Wilders fight with Molina? Remember this was only Furys 26th fight and that was Wilders 34th fight and considering one was a world title fight Seferi was 23-1 (21KOs) Molina was 23-2 (17KOs) Both were former CWs
No, I believe Fury and Joshua to be the consensus top 2. Hence why it would require Joshua to fight the Wilder - Fury winner to establish a new lineage.
I do, but it's not really worth mentioning as it's not very likely. If I were ranking the fights in terms of likelihood it would go: Most likely - Fury - Wilder II Unlikely - Joshua - Wilder Least Likely - Joshua - Fury