Lomachenko Would Be One of Pacquiao's EASIEST FIGHTS; KO—Any Version, Any Weight.

This is such a great fight on paper that it honestly wouldn't surprise me if boxing fanatics are still debating who would win this fight 20 years from now and probably still debating whether Loma actdually did duck Pac too.

This is a true 50/50 fight in my mind. To swing towards Loma would be to overlook Pac's power and experience and to swing towards Pac would be to overlook Loma's ring IQ and athleticism.

Of course, it could also turn out to be a mismatch too and reasonable arguments can and already have been cited for either man overwhelming his opponent.
I disagree however and personally believe this fight would be an absolute masterclass in the sweet science and extremely competive from the first bell.

And that is why I believe Loma is a smart man for not risking this one IMO: he doesn't need Pac's scalp to continue building upon his legacy and, judging by the discussion surrounding this fight, even were he to beat Pac, it could still end up doing more harm to his legacy than good.

That's my 2 cents anyway.

 

I know Holy wanted to fight the Klitschkos but he was totally shot by then. I personally think that having Holy on there would have meant nothing except for possible brain damage for Holyfield. That guy was too brave for his own good and would have gotten sent to ICU.

 

Pac is still levels better than Loma's recent opposition.

 

Yeah, you wouldn't, but I've seen casuals say he was being ducked. And even hard cores note how they don't have an ATG name on their resume while not minding that alot of other ATGs only had shot versions of ATGs on their resume (holmes, Tyson Johnson, Marciano etc etc)

 

I think Pacquiao gives him a good fight if they fought now!

Loma is class but Pacquaio was on another level

 

What fight?

 

What are you basing an 'old shot' PAC kayoing Loma at 135 on?

 

id like to see the fight

 

This whole thing about Marquez schooling Pacquiao is a joke. Pacquiao kept putting him on his ass and landing hard shots, walking through everything and being the aggressor. They were close fights that ended in a draw and Pac win. It's a combat sport here with emphasis on combat part. The 4th one being well past the expiration date. It was 8 years after the first fight, FFS.

Ironically the guy who comprehensively beat Pacquiao was Erik Morales. But nobody brings it up because the results weren't controversial, as Erik simply won the fight. And unlike Marquez who's relatively less success against Pac was largely due to styles, Erik beat Pac simply because he was that good.

 

He's referring to Loma saying he won't get credit for fighting the corpse of Pacman.

It'd be an interesting fight but Loma doesn't want any of it. I don't see the point in making these threads a few times a week. We get it already.

 

if the bean counters where doing their job they'd be checking these sites to see what fights would actually sell