Does it mean he can't ko GGG canelo , Jacobs ,..? Is that a bad logic. Tell me your opinon on that logic ?
It’s not sound logic, I don’t think Charlo could KO Canelo, he may be able to stop GGG coz of his age and jacobs because he has shown vunerability in the whiskers before. Trout’s bread and butter is making top names struggle, except for Lara no one has made easy work of Trout.
GGG rocked Canelo, not the other way around, not sure what the logic is with that assessment, add to that GGG isn't all that easy to hit either, so its not like Canelo has the edge in defense either. Here's the reality, Charlo IS NOT stopping either of them.
Of course he can. There are two reasons as to why Jermall couldn't stop Trout: 1) Trout is one though mofo. 2) Trout outboxed Jermall(and got robbed). Hard to KO someone who is outboxing you.
According to GGG cheerleaders Canelo and Jacobs weren't going to make it more than 3 rounds because GGG could knock out heavy weights
So youre saying Trout has better defense than Golokvin? Golovkin is a full middleweight, Trout isnt, yet Trout couldnt get knocked out by Charlo. You really DKSAB.
I didn’t say Charlo definitely stops GGG, I meant due to age Charlo has ‘A CHANCE’ of stopping GGG. The reality is GGG is halfway retired, he is inactive, so even though he has iron chin if Charlo were to catch him with the right body shot you never know what would happen. Canelo is a good puncher but he isn’t a heavy handed puncher. I could be wrong hopefully GGG makes the fight and we can find out which one of us is making the wrong assessment.
What’s the size got to do with who has a better defence. GGG has the better chin for sure but in terms of defensive skills Trout has better head and body movement plus faster feet.