Chisora v a prime Bruno who would have won?

Just read a thread comparing Chis to another nearly man, Herol Graham, but I pointed out that Derek`s career is more like Bruno`s was until he finally won a version of the world title v McCall, thing is I feel Chis would have beaten McCall also and Graham pushed McCallum to a split decision and neither Bruno nor Chis can boast anything even close to that. Am I wrong or over simplistic here?

 

Bruno gassed by the 8th v Lewis.

 

Tillis was much older than Chisora is now when he fought Bruno and Williams had been knocked out several times before Bruno beat him, Carl was very open to the left hook.

 

I feel it was Frank`s muscle mass that made him gas and Whyte`s punches were less sloppy than Lewis`s were v Bruno, the hook Whyte hit Chisora with was better than the hook Lewis hit Frank with, Frank was wide open to the counter after going for broke v Lewis and got caught lie Chisora because he fought in straight lines with no lateral movement, Lewis improved vastly afteer Steward straightened his right hand.

 

In 1987 he was upset in eight rounds, as underdog (and regular Tyson sparring partner) Michael Williams came off the floor to stop Tillis. Later in the same year, he was stopped in five rounds on cuts by future champ Frank Bruno. Chisora at 34 would have destroyed Williams. I pasted this from wiki because I couldn`t be bothered writing this, I knew Tillis was finished even by 29 though.

 

Morrison knocked out Williams in the fight before Bruno with a hook, and he had been beaten a few fights previous to meeting Tommy, at 34 he was far more finished than Chisora, who looked far better v Whyte, Dillian would have knocked Williams out with the first hook he landed and would have landed it pretty easily because Carl always left his right glove low.