Pavlik was the better fighter, Hopkins at the age he beat Pavlik would have still beaten a prime Eubank far worse than he did Pavlik, I feel Sr was vastly overrated.
Are you ever going to stop these silly comparisons that you use to base the outcome of every single fight??? When will you learn Boxing doesn't work that way. Come to your own conclusion for once based on your own opinion
Eubank quite easily, though loses a few rounds on workrate when he goes for a walk and turns his back; with Pavlik being straight up and down he can probably stop him - maybe on cuts - with his sharpshooting.
Think of him what you will, he has kindly asked people to stop saying this. Probably not appropriate in either case...
I think Eubank has too superior movement for Pavlick to have any significant offense against him. Eubank wins 8-4 with better jab and movement.
The way to beat Eubank is a high work rate like Steve Collins, Mike McCallum and Joe Calzaghe. Eubank iron chin would absorb the Ghost bombs and box his way to a comfortable dec. No Pavlik vs Taylor like comeback here.
Agreed. If he IS autistic, kind of a dikk move to chastise him for it. In fact, it makes one a real A-hole.
Eubank is far too clever for Pavlik. He'd out maneouvre him and pepper him with hard counters all night. Eubank stoppage
