Underrated Power on this forum ..

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by he grant, Jan 4, 2019.


  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,401
    9,347
    Jul 15, 2008
    There are some fighters that are consistently under rated when it comes to their power on this forum. Two that I see this most often attributed to are Marvin Hagler and Joe Frazier. Both were murderous punchers .. Frazier was a small man fighting mostly bigger men and dominated most with his power .. Hagler was flat out a destructive puncher at middleweight. He crushed people .. no one flattens everyone every time but both these guys were big hitters that many here seem to categorize as above average at best .. I disagree.
     
  2. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,092
    15,557
    Dec 20, 2006
    I would add Marciano, even though it is a controversial point recently
     
  3. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,746
    11,286
    Aug 22, 2004
  4. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,245
    6,966
    Nov 22, 2014
    This.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,099
    Feb 15, 2006
    Possibly Jeffries and Wills.
     
  6. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,570
    Jan 30, 2014
    Other than Tyson and Lewis just about every fighter born after 1960.
     
    NoNeck and mark ant like this.
  7. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    Hagler was NOT a murderous puncher. Far from it. Even he would be insulted being called that. He was a boxer-puncher with a little above ave power.
    FRAZIER WAS MURDEROUS
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't see either as, "murderous punchers",very good punchers, but not murderous.
    For me Frazier's great asset as a puncher was his ability to" fire and reload", instantly.
    Hagler was very accurate with his big shots, but not a pure puncher like Ketchel,Steele Hostak,Robinson.etc imo.
     
  9. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,498
    9,519
    Jun 9, 2010
    Hagler was a clinical, heavy-handed puncher. Sharp, accurate, hard, destructive by volume, but not consistently concussive.

    I always felt that Frazier carried cannons that he could unleash at any moment.
     
  10. Bronze Tiger

    Bronze Tiger Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,309
    5,211
    Jun 23, 2018
    Everyone thinks of Hagler as the guy from the Hearns fight. But he almost never fought that way. He was a very cerebral fighter. When I first started watching tapes of him I was actually disappointed. I was expecting him to fight like Evander Holyfield.
     
    escudo, The Morlocks and Man_Machine like this.
  11. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,046
    Apr 1, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    Hagler didn`t stop as many of his world title challengers early like some bigger punchers down the years.
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    He was also harder to hit than Holy too.
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  14. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,498
    9,519
    Jun 9, 2010
    Hagler has an 80% stoppage rate in World Title bouts.
     
  15. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    I said early.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.