Do some fans feel Holyfield could have beaten a prime Foreman?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jan 8, 2019.

  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,194
    Likes Received:
    16,999
    Foreman takes him out.
     
    red cobra likes this.
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,584
    Foreman threw more power punches than Bowe who stopped Holy once and George had a wicked body attack also.
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,584
    Young was far more cagey than Holy, he often got caught.
     
  4. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,969
    Likes Received:
    10,438
    I'm a fan of Holyfield but, when it comes to fantasy match-ups on these boards, he does tend to become all things to meet any circumstances.
     
    KuRuPT, BitPlayerVesti and mark ant like this.
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    18,341
    Likes Received:
    15,938
    That’s nice...is it at this time, that I am supposed to change my mind? Or will you give me a cue later on?
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
    Man_Machine, Tramell, louis54 and 2 others like this.
  6. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2017
    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    4,277
    Holyfield is the better boxer, he is faster, has better stamina, and better skills. Foreman had either bad stamina or bad pacing, but regardless he got sloppier and weaker as a fight progressed. I would take Holyfield to stop Foreman anytime after the 4th round. People combine old Foreman with his better pacing, better defense and better ring smarts with the Foreman who was faster in the 70s. The combined Foreman never existed.

    Holyfield was a complete fighter who would be only slightly smaller than the 70s Foreman who was 6-3, 217 when he beat Frazier. Holyfield was a sharp, quick, accurate puncher and should be able to hit Foreman early in the fight and it should get easier as the rounds progress. I wouldn't expect Foreman to make it past 6 or 7 rounds.
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,042
    Likes Received:
    7,586
    This content is protected
     
    SHADAPBLAD and robert ungurean like this.
  8. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2018
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    7,219
    I’d pick Holyfield. The man was a winner he’s not just going to fight Foremans fight and 70s Foreman was very one dimensional. Holyfield probably goes down at some point but he wins.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  9. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2018
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    7,219
    I think this is a good analysis and one that I agree with.
     
  10. SHADAPBLAD

    SHADAPBLAD Viscous Knockouts Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2017
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    1,275
    If women had chosen to eat Holyfield's children, figuratively speaking, he might have been better off financially.
     
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    66,940
    Likes Received:
    87,980
    Holyfield was a very well rounded boxer. He probably could meet most circumstances. I feel that he would have been better if he'd been just a little less macho and headstrong though.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  12. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,969
    Likes Received:
    10,438
    I wouldn't dispute that Holyfield was a versatile all-rounder, but he could be both out-boxed and overpowered. He was a better brawler than boxer, in my opinion and, whichever way he decided to play it, he'd neither be winning a slugfest nor controlling a tactical battle with a Prime Foreman.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  13. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    66,940
    Likes Received:
    87,980
    I don't think he'd win a slugfest. I think he might win a tactical battle. It'd be good to see, anyway.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  14. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,365
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Prime Foreman would flog him. To be fair, Holyfield would have his moments, but they would be few and far in between and he'd eventually succumb to Foreman's immense power.

    Foreman KO5
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55,255
    Likes Received:
    10,364
    Holyfield had a top chin, far better stamina, much better hand speed, defense, the ability to counter. Size wise they would be close to even.

    I think Foreman would gas a bit and lose either a decision or get stopped late.
     
    BCS8, InMemoryofJakeLamotta and Pat M like this.