Power to the people ... or Hearn and Warren

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Tyson Furry, Jan 5, 2019.


  1. Nicksp1976

    Nicksp1976 Member Full Member

    299
    262
    Oct 17, 2017
    Then I understand your frustration however your probably in a very small minority and the issue should be the amount of money you pay for your sky subscription as you don't watch it rather than the amount of money you pay for PPV which you do watch.
     
    S.K and im sparticus like this.
  2. ZiggerZagger

    ZiggerZagger Active Member Full Member

    907
    589
    Mar 13, 2012
    Why are you charging through the nose , isn't that a very short termist attitude towards the online advertising market ?

    Or is it a case of that you want to make as much as you can before you retire ?
     
    S.K and TonyHayers like this.
  3. TonyHayers

    TonyHayers Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,863
    2,375
    Nov 1, 2018
    That's fair enough but I think you have to acknowledge you're very much in the minority here. A Sky package purely for standard Sky boxing looks like (and is) a disastrous rip off.
     
    im sparticus likes this.
  4. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,258
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Yes. If people don't feel like they're getting value for money or worse are being ripped off, then that coupled with the many other problems the sport faces could cause real real problems further down the line.

    I'll write a more in depth post later when I get a second.
     
  5. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,258
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Funny but in no way applicable.

    Firstly I'm not especially concerned with the well beig of the market. If Hearn and Warren want to admit they don't care about the future of boxing in the same way then they can. Until then it can't be compared.

    Secondly freelancers in any industry are paid way over the odds because they're far too often just covering for over paid idiot staffers who can't get the job done themselves.
     
  6. Tyson Furry

    Tyson Furry Member Full Member

    335
    204
    Nov 27, 2017
    But if no one pays - the price goes down - or in this case, less PPV.
     
  7. Twentyman

    Twentyman You dog nonce! banned Full Member

    7,197
    14,789
    Apr 20, 2016
    These people defending PPV’s, making comparisons with the price of a pizza, saying it’s not much money...you’re incredibly out of touch with the real world. I don’t know your social context, perhaps you still live with your parents, maybe you don’t have kids and have plenty of disposable income, maybe you’ve just done well for yourselves but i’ll guess this...you’ve never been on the bones of your a**e because you simply don’t have working class values. If you had then you’d have more empathy for those who barely get by. You’d understand the value of £20, which might just be a bit of loose change in your pocket but it might be the difference between a boxing fan (who’s a parent) being able to buy their kid a new pair of school shoes or whatever.
     
  8. Tyson Furry

    Tyson Furry Member Full Member

    335
    204
    Nov 27, 2017
    Too right - I just got the bill for Fury Wilder - wouldn’t have missed that one for the world, but if I’d brought the Whyte fight and the Frampton too - that’s around £60. I would have loved to see all the fights last month & undercards, but I’ve got a family that needs feeding too. Working class fight fans end up choosing between buying the essentials or going skint - not a good situation. Fans need to turn their back on PPV now - at least the minor fights, or it’ll only get worse. Fight fans talk - should easy to generate a swell of support for anti PPV - short term pain for long term gain
     
    im sparticus and Twentyman like this.
  9. 305th

    305th Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,941
    3,829
    Apr 28, 2018
    Exactly mate.

    I'll start paying for PPV enthusiastically when Sky and BT and their associated boxing interests start funding/sponsoring boxing academies or at least start donating some wedge to the amateur clubs with holes in their roofs or gloves with stuffing hanging out of which there are many. Rugby and football clubs have academies don't forget which take in talented kids from young and provide damn near everything they need save a bed.
     
    Twentyman likes this.
  10. Tyson Furry

    Tyson Furry Member Full Member

    335
    204
    Nov 27, 2017
    Can’t believe how many people on this forum seem to be in favour of the ‘box office show’. I wonder if they enjoy their ‘privileged’ status as part of the minority who can afford to pay - even though their continual support of PPV removes the enjoyment of boxing from the majority who can’t.
     
  11. ZiggerZagger

    ZiggerZagger Active Member Full Member

    907
    589
    Mar 13, 2012
    I get what you’re saying but in all seriousness anyone who can’t afford their kids school shoes (and I know there are plenty out there) then they shouldn’t even consider spending £20 on boxing , a pizza or anything else non essential.

    Not sure I’ve read too many people moaning about PPV’s because they can’t afford to pay for it , rather they don’t want to and of course no one wants to pay for stuff if they don’t have to, but it’s the same with everything these days.

    Where does a fan of any sport (with a couple of exceptions) get access to them for nothing , they’re very few and far between these days.

    I think eventually the well will run dry and PPV’s will disappear again , but boxing will go on and find it’s level revenue wise . Right now though it’s an endless money pit so it seems and those involved want the biggest slice of the pie they can get while they can .

    As I understand it there are other ways to view these events if one really wants to .
     
  12. S.K

    S.K Active Member banned Full Member

    905
    599
    Jan 7, 2017
    6.66% of 66 million would be around 4.3 million.

    400k is 0.6%.


    You realise you can get sky ppvs without having a sky subscription? Plus, if you shop about you can get a sky subscription at a very reasonable price. I pay £27 / month for every channel. Granted if you pay full price (think it’s about £65) then your getting ripped off.

    All due respect pal your massively and incorrectly stereotyping there.

    Can’t get more working class than me and I disagree with everything you’ve said.

    Brought up in a terraced. 7 of us. Mum was a cleaner. I now have 2 kids, house mortgage cars, and £20 is not a lot of money pal. I’m not even defending PPVs here. But it’s £20.

    The facts are, the numbers for ppvs are good. They’re making big profits. So even if you don’t agree with them, how can you seriously expect them to just not charge £20? Oh and btw, I don’t buy ppvs anymore, so again I’m not defending them. It’s just common sense.


    On a side note, every single business out there tries to extract as much money out of you as possible. Every single one. They are all at it. Airlines, supermarkets, clothes stores etc etc. Literally every business.

    And if we are going to be shocked at what consumers spend there money on, how the **** did we let the sugar tax get through?

    Think about it, they are TAXING US, to drink ****ing sugar lol. It’s clearly a shocking horrible money grab by the government preying on the obese or anyone addicted to sugar.

    I have a feeling that our grandparents would have not allowed this tax to be passed through parliament. We’ve all gone soft.
     
  13. Jurgen

    Jurgen Pay Per Pudding Advisor banned Full Member

    13,211
    19,139
    Sep 30, 2016

    I make it 0.61% mate now my eyes are working better - must have been trying to help Tony Hayers justify PPVs with my inaccurate reading. :error:
     
    S.K likes this.
  14. 305th

    305th Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,941
    3,829
    Apr 28, 2018
    Hmm you seem to be missing something. You're saying you don't pay for PPV's and pay a knock off Sky package, then say you haven't got a problem with PPV prices and have a pop at people that do. That's like me saying I nick half my food from tesco every week but I don't have a problem with their prices.

    They're taxing sugar because diabetes costs the NHS more than any other disease and type 2, the most common is largely attributed to obesity which is largely attributed to excess calories (mainly carbs in the form of sugar) and a lack of exercise. Simplified but basically true. That's like saying they shouldn't tax smokers cos' they're addicted, nevermind all the health issues. Sugar in excess is poison, hence it gets taxed. In fact, it's probably healthier to eat Paleo and smoke a few ***s a day and exercise as opposed to lard-arsing around and eating donughts and guzzling coke.
     
  15. Tyson Furry

    Tyson Furry Member Full Member

    335
    204
    Nov 27, 2017
    Sounds a little bit like ‘I’m alright Jack’ - & that’s the problem for the majority who think £20 is a lot of money - especially when it’s £20 every month - sometimes £40.
    ... & with regard to ‘sugar tax’ I think you need to go to the Daily Mail forum for that one!