Not only did Wilder not lose on the cards, he should have won by ko

? The judges had Wilder wider, learn to read.

 

The legitimacy of the count is in question, learn to read.

What's factual is that he made an illegitimate 10 count after thorough compare/contrasting.

 

Nope, but what's fact is that they had it wider. Did I say they had Wilder the winner?

 

Yes, he did.

I already stated it MULTIPLE times in this thread, go back and read it.

Go compare and contrast Jack Reiss' counts from his previous fights, you'll see a big difference.

 

Yeah, he won the fight because the count was illegitimate (He truly won) but he got robbed.

On the cards, Wilder and Fury drew. What's so hard to understand?

English must be hard for you.

 

Even Ray Charles could see Wilder truly won that fight, he got robbed by Reiss and his extremely slow count.

 

Once again, the argument isn't whether or not he got up via Reiss' count, it's whether or not Reiss made a legitimate count (And the answer to that is NO).

If he made a legitimate count, Fury doesn't get up. It's obvious.

Through thorough analysis, you can easily spot the difference between his count in his fight and his other ones.

 

You don't seem to comprehend much of anything, I've stated what was illegitimate about it, it was a deliberate slow count.

I've already won this argument.