Full article http://locfoundation.org/news-events/uncategorized/my-thoughts-on-the-2019-heavyweight-division I’ve recently heard Eddie Hearn talking about how he doesn’t like what I’ve said in regards to the Wilder negotiations in 2018. In my fighting years, I laced my gloves up in the ring for protection of myself and my opponents. Outside of the ring, there are no gloves. We don’t put pillows on to soften the blow. Eddie needs to put his big boy pants on and understand that criticism and scrutiny are a part of the game. No boxer or promoter is above it. Right or wrong, I’ve had my fair share also. It comes with the territory. In my career, I created my own path, chose my own destiny, fought for everything I’ve earned, and achieved all I’ve set out for in the sport. In my era, I sought out the best to prove I was the best. So I don’t take it lightly when my hard earned reputation is put in question. I have no problem speaking my mind, which seems to hurt people’s feelings, but my views are not, and cannot, be swayed by a tv commentating contract, favour for a fellow Brit, jealousy of a new crop of talent, or the opinions of paid keyboard warriors. I manage my character and everything surrounding Lennox Lewis. (Yep, third person.) There’s no puppet master here. I just call it like I see it, like I always have. For those of you who push this false narrative, I invite you to join me here at my League of Champions Youth Boxing Camp, where, among other things, we teach integrity.
I tweeted a reply to this and he ‘liked’ it. I appreciate it’s just a daft little thing but my boyhood hero giving me thumbs up to something I said is a nice feeling haha.
Nobodies like Dave Coldwell and Eddie Hearn, who never boxed anywhere remotely near top level, speaking out against a legend of the game who fought everybody for real, is laughable. Lennox putting them in their place.
hmmmmmm....paid keyboard warriors you say Lennox? Hearn is rattled for the first real time ...He is left covered in his own BS
The problem with Lennox talking like this is that he repeatedly makes comparisons with his own career, and I'm not sure they're always favourable. His 'at some point you need to stop milking the fans and give people the fights they want to see' comment for example. Lennox didn't fight Mike Tyson until Tyson was nearly 36 and, in the eyes of many, a shell of his former self. Lennox didn't fight Evander Holyfield until Holyfield was 36, and the second fight took place when he was 37. After the wars with Tyson and Bowe and the long career, nobody would say this was Holyfield in his prime. Lennox didn't fight Riddick Bowe at all. Before we got to see Lennox against any of the guys the fans really wanted to see, we did get to see him fight Mavrovic, Akinwande and Morrison. I'm not making these points to dismiss what Lennox Lewis achieved. He's the greatest British boxer of his generation and an undisputed all time great. But I think it's a legitimate question to ask why there seems to be the need to rush the current crop when he didn't and still achieved greatness. Lewis says his own view was Joshua Wilder should have happened in 2018. That's fine, but by the same token, that makes me think at least one of Lewis v Holyfield, Tyson or Bowe should have happened in 1996.
I have always said that Lewis is bitter over AJ, for what reason, I have no idea. He literally looks distraught when he has to edge towards giving him a compliment.
Lennox destroying Hearn with words and class. However, no doubt Eddie will just laugh it off in his next video with Kugan, make some crass and disrespectful jokes about 'Lenn-awks' and the idiotic lad banter, football supporting, casual Matchroom bumsquad will lap it up and disrespect an ATG British athlete themselves.
What happens if Hearn comes back and points out Lennox never fought a world class opponent until they were all past their best? Do you just keep flapping your gums about casuals? Or accept Lennox looks slightly contradictory here?
Lennox Lewis is just moving the goalposts again and again. His main argument seems to be because he accepted less as the B side vs Holyfield that means AJ as the A side should accept less. It makes no sense at all and if it was like for like shouldnt he be telling the B side fighter Wilder to take less.
So the basis of the article is that it's fine for Lewis to question Joshua's integrity, but no ok, for anyone to question why Lewis' regular criticisms of Joshua have coincided with his employment by PBC.
Fair comment. That said, it's not a fundamentally conclusive answer to the fact that Lewis, for whatever reason, appears to be suggesting that Joshua has to fight Wilder and Fury almost immediately, when he himself failed to fight Holyfield, Bowe and Tyson in their prime, if at all. I've no doubt he would be very keen to point out that wasn't all his doing. But, that doesn't change the fact that even whilst he fought those opponents after their prime, his legacy hasn't suffered.