Lomas stock just went way down

You don't make sense. Salido was fat, but obviously tough for Lomachenko that night. Loma went for it, and got a lesson in his 8th pro fight. As I've previously pointed out, Loma ball gobblers are way to sensitive. I've never stated that Linares was trash, I've said he was a quality opponent, but that he was over rated, and I gave reasons why. Lost to DeMarco, got arse raped by Cano, struggled with bums etc. Those things put the tough fight Loma had with him in perspective. As for "champs" Come on now, Pedraza got the **** beat out of him by Tank. He moved up and fought one of the weakest titlists in all of boxing in Beltran. A guy that got a gift decision in his previous bout against an old man. So what does that mean? It just means that boxing is corrupt, and sometimes mediocre fighters are given titles. That doesn't all of a sudden mean that the titlist is actually good. It's why Crawford's win over Indongo doesn't mean ****. Lomachenko has never fought a great, so what are you talking about? He also hasn't shown the balls that should be associated with a guy of his talent level. We had 37 year old Rigondeaux going up two weight classes to test himself against an absolute beast. We have Garcia going up two weight classes to test himself against an absolute beast. When the subject comes up with Loma we get, the one inch taller Crawford "he's too big" or "fighting Crawford would be career suicide" I can predict that after Prograis wins the WBSS, Loma won't want a piece of him either. He's content to fight bums, while the extremist section of his fan base will tout him as the greatest boxer ever. His legacy is going to be handicapped by selective match making. I'd favor him over Tank, Berchelt, Machado and all those guys right now, but he's being handled in a manner which suggests there is fear of losing by his handlers, if he is matched in tough fights.

 

Paragraphs, understanding context, being honest. Work on it, you sound ridiculous. You’re saying that Lomachenko is content to fight bums. Lomachenko. Lomachenko. I won’t waste my time responding to that, and neither should anyone else. We are all dumber for having read that absurd block of text.

 

I think Russell Jr is his best win but I get your point. Linares is his second best win and he just got worked easily.

 

wtf do you care what others respond to? man made some points i want to see challenged, if you aint up to the task, then let someone who knows about boxing handle it.

 

Linares has multiple loses before he even fought Loma. If that's the case Demarco ruined him.

 

You ******* how dare you talk bad about loma ...don't you ever say such things of him again

 

A roided Erik Morales

 

Log off

 

So PBF and Hurd are the same size? You're embarrassing yourself please stop. PBF was tiny at 154.

 

The irony here is hilarious especially when considering you're an alt who has obviously been banned for trolling. Why are you coming back? You have been banned.

 

Stop! Hatton won 1 round at best against PBF.

 

PBF systematically broke Hatton down and stopped him beating him at his own game. With that said Pac destroyed Hatton as well.

 

The thing is, people are using LInares being KO'd in one round as an excuse to throw shade at Lomachenko. Linares came to fight that night. Being highly motivated can do wonders for a frighter's performance. See; early rounds of Hatton-Mayweather, Khan-Canelo, ect.

 

Hatton didn't do anything in those early rounds against PBF. He won 1 round at best in that fight while Linares dropped Loma and won more than 1 round. I don't see how a comparison can be made.