Groves an over-or-underachiever?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Howitzer1888, Jan 30, 2019.


Groves’ Achievement

  1. Overachiever

    11.1%
  2. Underachiever

    28.9%
  3. Neither (achieved what he should have)

    60.0%
  1. Howitzer1888

    Howitzer1888 Active Member Full Member

    981
    795
    Jun 7, 2017
    Seen a variety of opinions since Groves’ retirement announcement. Whilst most seem to be in agreement that his retirement at this stage was a good decision, I’ve heard opinions such as that George was an underachiever who was a tad unlucky on his career, and others such as that he was fortunate to win a world title with his suspect stamina, chin, and leaky defence. Which one do you think is closer to the truth, or do you think it’s somewhere in the middle?
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    Groves defense and jab were better than Froch`s.
     
    ryanm8655 and Suspect.chin like this.
  3. pne buz

    pne buz Active Member Full Member

    1,173
    87
    Apr 20, 2008
    Had a good career, the Froch fights made him financially but took a bit away from him as a fighter.If you told Groves at the start of his career he would achieve what he has I think he would be happy.
     
    Suspect.chin and Breazer5678 like this.
  4. rski

    rski Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    1,795
    May 12, 2013
    I think under, in the sense he had the ability to do more. I'm not sure he would have beaten everyone and reigned supreme but I think some bad luck behind the scenes hindered him.
     
    Suspect.chin likes this.
  5. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,521
    8,668
    Apr 25, 2008
    With hindsight, he achieved what you would expect him to achieve, all things considered. He should have achieved more with his ability, but he achieved more than what you would expect for someone with his chin and stanima.
     
  6. Camaris

    Camaris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,403
    963
    Jul 11, 2012
    Over achiever. World champion and 2-0 against Degale.

    One of my favourite fighters in interview for sure.
     
  7. CasualFan

    CasualFan Active Member Full Member

    1,361
    1,405
    Oct 23, 2013
    Am I right in saying GG only got dropped 3 times? Froch, Jack & Callum Smith. One of those being a bodyshot, all World Champions. Kenny Miller had him going but I don't remember if he dropped him or not. That dosent equate to someone with a bad chin.
     
  8. ryanm8655

    ryanm8655 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    2,894
    Oct 23, 2008
    His chin wasn’t that bad...got hit with a shot that would iron out most by Froch and still got up...wasn’t iron but he wasn’t Amir Khan.

    I’d say underachieved. With a bit more luck could’ve unified...unlucky not to get the nod vs Jack and could’ve won the first Froch fight...combine that with the issues behind the scenes and he could’ve achieved more.

    Injury was also bad luck...he’s only 30...

    He did seem to lose something post Froch...a bit of that explosiveness...looked much bigger at the weight in his more recent fights so perhaps it was weight struggles. I don’t think we ever saw the Groves of Froch I with the intelligence and composure in his more recent fights. Had we then he’d have achieved more imo.
     
    Smudge_ likes this.
  9. caligula4

    caligula4 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,764
    886
    Jul 13, 2011
    Didn't Kenny Anderson drop him before George stopped him? Fight seems forever ago now that I can't 100% recall for sure... edit: saw you mentioned Kenny haha, the Miller threw me off.
     
    moog likes this.
  10. ryanm8655

    ryanm8655 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    2,894
    Oct 23, 2008
    IIRC he touched down...
     
    caligula4 likes this.
  11. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,521
    8,668
    Apr 25, 2008
    Groves certainly didn't have a bad chin. For me, it was slightly lacking at the very top level. He had good defensive skills so he could protect it, and, to be fair to him, I think his lack of a top class tank would weaken his chin as the rounds progressed.

    I just feel that against the very top level fighters, his chin, and stanima, would come into question.
     
    Howitzer1888, Holler and Dangerwood84 like this.
  12. Dangerwood84

    Dangerwood84 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,935
    13,133
    Sep 21, 2017
    For me this post says it all.
     
  13. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,841
    3,989
    Apr 26, 2014
    From a technical perspective yes but you would have to argue Froch's defense was better taking into consideration the amount of times each fighter was stopped or dropped. Groves jab was also good but underutilized.
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    I feel Groves improved skillwise after his bout with Froch, Carl was always easy to hit, Groves had Eubank chasing shadows.
     
  15. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,559
    May 4, 2017
    Groves would have been a champ in most decades and was simply beter than Degale.