You're calling me a troll when Jacobs beat Chenko last year and Canelo beat GGG. Yet you're saying GGG-Chenko is going to determine who's the best MW in the world? Like I said earlier log off dumbass troll. A close fight in which the guy you like better doesn't get the nod does not equal them winning. When will delusional people like you realize this? I wanted Charlo to beat Harrison I picked him to win and scored it for him but guess what he lost a close decision. Am I crying here and saying Charlo beat Harrison no I'm not, he's 0-1 against Harrison. That's the difference between me and stupid ass bitter trolls like you who can't handle a loss and when the decision didn't go the way you wanted it to go.
When you don't have the depth of understanding that judges can score a fight incorrectly, then I can't really give you a long response back. Check what the word delusional means before you use it. Canelo lost, so did Jacobs.
Listen, I picked Chenko to beat Jacobs thought he made a great account of himself but the knockdown ended up being the difference to anyone who didn't have an agenda. Jacobs won a close fight it was no robbery.
I actually thought this might be true until Derevyenchenko fought Jacobs. I think there was just too big a gap in class between the dudes Chenk had fought (in the pros) and Jacobs. Too big a jump. I thought he would do better against Jacobs. He showed heart in that fight after getting dropped and stunned early. I wanted Sergey to beat Jacobs but he didn't. He's still right up there and can get a belt if luck goes his way.
If the wrong person gets his hand raised it is a robbery. 90 percent of the boxing establishment thought GGG beat Canelo the first time, 80 percent of the boxing establishment thought GGG beat Canelo the second time.